1. Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common inflammatory arthritis, affecting ~1% of the global population. It is a chronic, symmetric, erosive polyarthritis driven by autoimmune synovial inflammation, with significant systemic and extra-articular manifestations. Early, treat-to-target management has transformed outcomes.

1.1 Epidemiology & Pathogenesis

Epidemiology: Prevalence 0.5–1%; Female:Male = 3:1; Peak onset 40–60 years. Higher prevalence in Native Americans (Pima/Chippewa ~5%). Increased mortality due to cardiovascular disease.

Pathogenesis: Gene–environment interaction: HLA-DRB1 shared epitope (most important genetic risk; OR ~5Γ—); PTPN22, CTLA4. Environmental: smoking (strongest modifiable risk; promotes citrullination via PAD enzymes), periodontitis (P. gingivalis), microbiome dysbiosis.

Citrullinated proteins β†’ anti-CCP (ACPA) β†’ immune complex formation β†’ synovial inflammation β†’ pannus formation β†’ joint destruction.

⚑ Pathogenesis High-Yield
  • Shared epitope (HLA-DRB1*04:01, *04:04, *01:01) β€” binds citrullinated peptides, activates CD4+ T cells
  • TNF-Ξ±, IL-1, IL-6, IL-17 β†’ synovial hyperplasia, osteoclast activation β†’ bone erosion
  • RF = IgM anti-IgG (sensitivity 70–80%, specificity 80%)
  • Anti-CCP (ACPA) = sensitivity 60–70%, specificity >95% β€” best specificity marker
  • ACPA appears up to 10 years before clinical RA (pre-clinical phase)
1.2 Clinical Presentation & Extra-articular Features

Articular: Symmetric polyarthritis β€” MCP, PIP (sparing DIP), wrists, MTPs. Morning stiffness >1 hour. Boggy synovitis, tenderness, warmth. Fusiform swelling of PIPs.

Joint deformities (late disease):

  • Swan-neck: PIP hyperextension, DIP flexion
  • BoutonniΓ¨re: PIP flexion, DIP hyperextension
  • Z-deformity thumb: MCP flexion, IP hyperextension
  • Ulnar deviation at MCPs
  • Piano-key sign: distal ulna instability
⚑ Extra-articular Manifestations
  • Rheumatoid nodules β€” subcutaneous, extensor surfaces; associated with seropositive, active disease; can form in lungs (Caplan syndrome = nodules + pneumoconiosis)
  • Pulmonary: ILD (UIP pattern most common), pleuritis, bronchiectasis, obliterative bronchiolitis (MTX lung)
  • Cardiac: Pericarditis, accelerated atherosclerosis, IHD (leading cause of mortality)
  • Ocular: Keratoconjunctivitis sicca (secondary SjΓΆgren's), episcleritis, scleritis, peripheral ulcerative keratitis (sight-threatening)
  • Felty syndrome: RA + splenomegaly + neutropenia (HLA-DR4 associated)
  • Vasculitis: Rare; digital infarcts, mononeuritis multiplex, cutaneous ulcers
  • Atlantoaxial subluxation (C1-C2): Risk with general anesthesia β€” screen with flexion/extension X-ray
πŸ”Ά Clinical Pearl: RA patients have 2Γ— increased cardiovascular mortality. CVD risk = similar to diabetes mellitus. Screen and manage CV risk factors aggressively. Hydroxychloroquine and methotrexate have cardioprotective effects.
1.3 ACR/EULAR 2010 Classification Criteria

Score-based criteria (apply to patients with β‰₯1 swollen joint not better explained by another diagnosis). Score β‰₯6/10 = definite RA.

DomainFindingsScore
Joint involvement1 large joint0
2–10 large joints1
1–3 small joints (with/without large)2
4–10 small joints3
Joint involvement (cont.)>10 joints (at least 1 small)5
SerologyNegative RF and ACPA0
Low-positive RF or ACPA (<3Γ— ULN)2
High-positive RF or ACPA (β‰₯3Γ— ULN)3
Acute-phase reactantsNormal CRP and ESR0
Abnormal CRP or ESR1
Duration of symptoms<6 weeks0
β‰₯6 weeks1
πŸ”Ά Clinical Pearl: The 2010 criteria are classification criteria for research, not diagnostic criteria. Seronegative RA (RFβˆ’/ACPAβˆ’) can still score β‰₯6 via joint involvement + APR + symptom duration. Always rule out: septic arthritis, gout, CPPD, OA, psoriatic arthritis, viral arthritis (parvovirus B19, HBV, HCV), SLE.
1.4 Laboratory & Imaging Workup

Serology: RF (IgM anti-IgG) β€” Sen 70–80%, Spec 80%; Anti-CCP (ACPA) β€” Sen 60–70%, Spec >95%. Both positive = "double-seropositive" β†’ worse prognosis, more erosive disease.

Acute phase reactants: ESR, CRP (better correlate with disease activity); CBC β€” normocytic anemia, thrombocytosis in active disease; LFT, renal function (baseline before DMARDs).

Imaging:

  • X-ray: Fusiform soft tissue swelling β†’ juxta-articular osteopenia β†’ marginal erosions (earliest at radial aspect 2nd/3rd MCP, ulnar styloid) β†’ joint space narrowing
  • Ultrasound: Detects synovitis (gray-scale) and vascularity (power Doppler) before X-ray changes; guides aspiration
  • MRI: Most sensitive for bone marrow edema (earliest erosion predictor), tenosynovitis, soft tissue
⚑ Early RA X-ray Sequence (Dr. Paijit)
  • Fusiform soft tissue swelling β†’ juxta-articular osteopenia β†’ ill-defined marginal erosions (2nd/3rd MCP radial side) β†’ joint space narrowing β†’ severe: subluxation, deformity
  • Basal joint RA: radio-carpal and intercarpal involvement
  • DIP joint sparing distinguishes RA from OA and PsA
1.5 Disease Activity Assessment
IndexComponentsRemissionLow ActivityHigh Activity
DAS28-CRP28 joint counts (tender + swollen) + CRP + VAS global<2.6≀3.2>5.1
SDAITJC28 + SJC28 + PGA + EGA + CRP≀3.3≀11>26
CDAITJC28 + SJC28 + PGA + EGA (no lab)≀2.8≀10>22
Boolean remissionTJC ≀1 + SJC ≀1 + CRP ≀1 mg/dL + PGA ≀1All ≀1β€”β€”
πŸ”Ά Clinical Pearl: ACR/EULAR 2019 recommends Boolean or SDAI/CDAI remission as treatment target. DAS28 <2.6 overestimates remission (does not include all relevant joints). For clinical trials, Boolean or SDAI remission is preferred.
1.6 RA Pharmacotherapy β€” csDMARDs
⚑ ACR 2022 RA Guidelines β€” Key Recommendations
  • Methotrexate (MTX) is the anchor drug / first-line csDMARD for all RA patients (unless contraindicated)
  • Target dose: MTX 15–25 mg/week (oral or SC); SC preferred at higher doses (better bioavailability)
  • Always co-prescribe folic acid 1 mg/day (or folinic acid) to reduce toxicity
  • Monitor: CBC, LFT, renal function every 4–8 weeks initially, then every 12 weeks
  • Contraindications: hepatic disease, renal impairment (CrCl <30), pregnancy, significant lung disease
DrugDoseKey MonitoringKey Toxicities
Methotrexate7.5–25 mg/week PO/SCCBC, LFT, Cr q4–8wkHepatotoxicity, myelosuppression, ILD (rare), teratogenicity, oral ulcers
Hydroxychloroquine5 mg/kg/day (≀400 mg/day)Ophthalmology q1y after 5yRetinal toxicity (irreversible), GI, rash, QTc prolongation
Sulfasalazine500 mg β†’ 1,000 mg BIDCBC, LFT q3–6moGI, headache, oligospermia, sulfa allergy, agranulocytosis (rare)
Leflunomide10–20 mg/dayCBC, LFT q4–8wkHepatotoxicity, teratogenicity (long half-life β€” cholestyramine washout), HTN, diarrhea
πŸ”Ά HCQ Retinal Toxicity: Deposits in retinal pigment epithelium. Risk factors: dose >5 mg/kg/day, duration >5 years, renal disease, tamoxifen co-use. Screen: annual OCT + visual field after 5 years (Marmor 2016 AAO Guidelines).
1.7 Treat-to-Target (T2T) Strategy

Based on TICORA, BeSt, CAMERA trials. ACR/EULAR 2010 T2T recommendations: target remission or low disease activity; adjust therapy every 1–3 months until target achieved.

⚑ ACR 2022 Treatment Algorithm (Abbreviated)
  • Step 1: csDMARD monotherapy β€” MTX preferred; if contraindicated: HCQ, SSZ, or LEF
  • Step 2 (if Step 1 fails after 3–6 months): Add bDMARD or JAKi OR switch to another csDMARD
  • bDMARD choices: TNFi (first-line for most), IL-6Ri, CTLA4-Ig (abatacept), anti-CD20 (rituximab β€” preferred if hx lymphoma, COPD)
  • JAKi (tsDMARD): Tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib β€” FDA/EMA note: prefer bDMARDs first due to safety signals (VTE, CV, malignancy) in ORAL Surveillance
  • Combination csDMARDs: MTX + HCQ + SSZ (triple therapy) β€” comparable to MTX + TNFi in TEAR and RACAT
1.8 Biological & Targeted Synthetic DMARDs
ClassAgentMechanismKey Considerations
TNF inhibitorsEtanerceptTNF receptor fusion proteinSC 50 mg/week; no lupus flare risk; preferred in MS
AdalimumabAnti-TNF mAbSC q2wk; available biosimilar
InfliximabAnti-TNF chimeric mAbIV infusion; must use with MTX (anti-drug antibodies)
Certolizumab pegolPEGylated Fab fragmentDoes not cross placenta β€” safe in pregnancy
IL-6R inhibitorTocilizumabIL-6 receptor blockadeCan use as monotherapy (no MTX needed); suppresses CRP; watch bowel perforation risk; lipid rise
IL-6 inhibitorSarilumabIL-6 receptor blockadeSC q2wk; similar efficacy to tocilizumab
CTLA4-IgAbataceptT-cell costimulation blockadePreferred in ILD-RA, seropositive; IV or SC; avoid live vaccines
Anti-CD20RituximabB-cell depletionIV 1g Γ— 2 (2 weeks apart); preferred in lymphoma hx, hep B carrier; pre-treat check HBsAg/anti-HBc
JAK inhibitorsTofacitinibJAK1/3 inhibitorOral 5 mg BID or 11 mg XR QD; VTE risk (higher dose); lipid monitoring
BaricitinibJAK1/2 inhibitorOral 2–4 mg QD; approved RA + COVID-19
UpadacitinibJAK1 selective inhibitorOral 15 mg QD; highest efficacy among JAKi
πŸ”Ά Pre-biologic Screening Checklist: TB screening (TST or IGRA) β€” treat latent TB before starting; Hepatitis B (HBsAg, anti-HBc, anti-HBs); Hepatitis C; Varicella IgG; Live vaccines (MMR, Varicella, Yellow fever) β€” complete β‰₯4 weeks before biologics; CBC, LFT, Cr.

πŸ“š Key References β€” RA

  • ACR 2022 RA Guideline β€” Fraenkel L et al., Arthritis Care Res 2021
  • EULAR 2022 RA Recommendations β€” Smolen JS et al., Ann Rheum Dis 2023
  • ORAL Surveillance β€” Ytterberg SR et al., NEJM 2022 (JAKi safety)
  • RACAT β€” O'Dell JR et al., NEJM 2013 (triple therapy = TNFi+MTX)
  • BeSt β€” Goekoop-Ruiterman YP et al., Arthritis Rheum 2005 (T2T)
1.9 Practice Questions
Q1. A 42-year-old woman presents with 3 months of morning stiffness >1 hour, symmetric swelling of bilateral MCPs and PIPs, with positive RF (1:320) and anti-CCP (450 U/mL). CRP is elevated. X-rays show soft tissue swelling and juxta-articular osteopenia. ACR/EULAR 2010 score?
Score = 9/10 β†’ Definite RA
Joint involvement: >10 small joints = 5; Serology: high-positive RF AND anti-CCP (β‰₯3Γ—ULN) = 3; APR: elevated CRP = 1; Duration β‰₯6 weeks = 1 β†’ but wait, β‰₯10 joints already scores 5. Re-check: MCPs + PIPs bilateral = small joints >10 β†’ 5 pts. Serology: both RF and anti-CCP high positive = 3 pts. APR: elevated CRP = 1 pt. Duration β‰₯6 weeks = not stated but implied β†’ assume 1 pt. Total β‰₯9. Start MTX + folic acid immediately.
Q2. Which bDMARD is preferred in a RA patient with co-existing COPD and previous lymphoma?
Rituximab
Rituximab is preferred in patients with history of lymphoma (lower risk of new malignancy vs TNFi) and in COPD (abatacept also acceptable). TNFi should be avoided in lymphoma history. Certolizumab pegol and etanercept are preferred TNFi in demyelinating disease. Abatacept is preferred in ILD-RA.

2. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

SLE is a chronic, multisystem autoimmune disease characterised by loss of tolerance to nuclear antigens, leading to immune-complex deposition and tissue injury. It predominantly affects women of reproductive age (F:M = 9:1), with higher prevalence and severity in Asian, African-American, and Hispanic populations. The therapeutic landscape has been transformed by EULAR 2023 recommendations, approval of anifrolumab and voclosporin, and breakthrough data from CAR-T cell therapy.

πŸ“š Key 2023–2025 References: EULAR 2023 SLE Recommendations (ARD 2024); TULIP-1 & TULIP-2 (NEJM 2020); AURORA-1 (Lancet 2021); BLISS-LN (NEJM 2020); NOBILITY/REGENCY (NEJM 2025); DORIS 2021; CAR-T NatMed 2022; NEJM case series 2024.
2.1 Epidemiology & Pathogenesis

Global prevalence: 20–150/100,000. Incidence peak: ages 15–45. Higher severity in Asian, African-American, and Hispanic populations. Mortality improved; leading causes of death: infection (early), cardiovascular disease (late), renal failure.

⚑ Pathogenesis β€” The IFN-Ξ± Central Axis
  • Defective apoptotic clearance β†’ nuclear material (dsDNA, histones, Ro, La) exposed β†’ ANA formation via molecular mimicry and bystander activation
  • Type I interferon (IFN-Ξ±/Ξ²) pathway β€” "interferon signature" present in 75–80% of SLE; driven by plasmacytoid DCs stimulated by nucleic-acid immune complexes via TLR7/TLR9; anifrolumab targets IFNAR1 to block this pathway
  • Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) β†’ release nuclear content β†’ activate pDCs β†’ amplify IFN-Ξ± loop; NET components are autoantigens
  • B-cell overactivity β†’ BLyS/BAFF drives survival and differentiation of autoreactive B-cells; belimumab blocks BLyS/BAFF; obinutuzumab and rituximab deplete CD20+ B-cells
  • Complement deficiency (C1q, C4A null allele, C2) β†’ defective clearance of apoptotic debris; C3/C4 consumed in active disease
  • T-cell dysregulation β€” Th17 excess, Treg deficiency; mTOR pathway hyperactivation; calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, voclosporin) target downstream effectors
Genetic RiskFunction/Association
HLA-DR2, HLA-DR3Antigen presentation; strongest HLA associations
C4 null allele (esp. C4A)Defective complement-mediated clearance; very high risk
IRF5, IRF7, STAT4IFN-Ξ± pathway activation
BLK, PTPN22B-cell signaling dysregulation
TREX1 (DNase III)Defective DNA degradation β†’ nucleic acid accumulation
FCGR2A/3BDefective Fc-receptor–mediated IC clearance
πŸ”Ά Drug-Induced Lupus (DIL): Causative drugs: hydralazine, procainamide, isoniazid, methyldopa, minocycline, TNF-inhibitors (TNFi-DIL: anti-dsDNA+ but anti-histoneβˆ’). Features: pleuritis, pericarditis, arthralgia, fever; renal/CNS involvement rare; resolves with drug withdrawal. Anti-histone Ab >95% in classic DIL.
2.2 EULAR/ACR 2019 Classification Criteria

Entry criterion: ANA β‰₯1:80 (HEp-2 cells) β€” required. Then additive weighted domains; total score β‰₯10 = SLE. Sensitivity 96.1%, Specificity 93.4%.

DomainCriterionWeight
ConstitutionalFever (>38.3Β°C, unexplained)2
HematologicLeukopenia (<4,000/mmΒ³)3
Thrombocytopenia (<100,000/mmΒ³)4
Autoimmune hemolysis (Coombs+)4
NeuropsychiatricDelirium2
Psychosis3
Seizure5
MucocutaneousNon-scarring alopecia2
Oral ulcers2
Subacute cutaneous or discoid lupus4
Acute cutaneous lupus (malar/photosensitive rash)6
SerosalPleural or pericardial effusion5
MusculoskeletalJoint involvement (synovitis β‰₯2 joints or tenderness + morning stiffness β‰₯30 min)6
RenalProteinuria >0.5 g/24h4
Class II or V LN (biopsy-proven)8
Class III or IV LN (biopsy-proven)10
Antiphospholipid AbAnti-cardiolipin IgG/IgM or anti-Ξ²2GP1 IgG/IgM2
Lupus anticoagulant positive3
Complement proteinsLow C3 OR low C43
Low C3 AND low C44
SLE-specific AbsAnti-dsDNA OR anti-Sm (above assay reference range)6
πŸ”Ά SLICC 2012 vs EULAR/ACR 2019: SLICC: 11 clinical + 6 immunologic criteria; β‰₯4 criteria OR biopsy LN + ANA/anti-dsDNA. Higher sensitivity (97%), better for early/incomplete SLE. EULAR/ACR 2019: higher specificity (93%), preferred for clinical trials and research. In daily practice, both are used. Only count criteria if not better explained by another diagnosis (no "domain exclusion").
2.3 Clinical Manifestations (System Overview)
SystemFeaturesClinical Pearls
Mucocutaneous (80%)Malar rash (spares nasolabial folds), photosensitivity, discoid lupus (DLE β€” scarring), SCLE (anti-Ro/SSA+), bullous lupus, alopecia, oral ulcers (painless)DLE β†’ permanent scarring/pigmentation; SCLE β†’ no scarring; malar rash differentiator: photodistributed, spares nasolabial folds (vs rosacea)
Musculoskeletal (90%)Non-erosive arthritis/arthralgia (symmetric, small joints); Jaccoud arthropathy (reducible subluxation, no erosion); avascular necrosis (steroid-related, disease-related β€” anti-aPL)Jaccoud = deformity on exam, NO erosions on X-ray. Avascular necrosis most common at femoral head; risk factors: high cumulative CS, APS
Renal (30–60%)Lupus nephritis (LN) β€” proteinuria, hematuria, RBC casts, HTN, AKI; asymptomatic until severeMost important prognostic factor. Biopsy essential for management. Class IV = worst prognosis without treatment
Hematologic (50–85%)Lymphopenia (most common, >50%), AIHA (Coombs+), ITP, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia; Evans syndrome = AIHA + ITPLymphopenia not in EULAR/ACR 2019 weighted criteria but is diagnostic clue. Anti-Ξ²2GP1 + thrombocytopenia β†’ APS overlap
Neuropsychiatric (40–70%)Headache (most common), psychosis, seizure, cerebrovascular disease (anti-aPL β†’ stroke), cognitive dysfunction, mononeuritis multiplex, transverse myelitis (rare)ACR 1999: 19 NPSLE syndromes. Stroke in young woman β†’ always consider APS. Anti-P ribosomal Ab β†’ NPSLE/psychosis
CardiovascularPericarditis (most common cardiac manifestation), Libman-Sacks endocarditis (sterile verrucous vegetations β€” mitral/aortic), myocarditis, accelerated atherosclerosis (10Γ— risk vs general population)Libman-Sacks on mitral valve β†’ regurgitation, embolic source (especially if APS). CAD risk: long-term inflammation + steroids + dyslipidemia
PulmonaryPleuritis/effusion, shrinking lung syndrome (diaphragm dysfunction), DAH (emergency), ILD (uncommon), PAH (anti-RNP+)Shrinking lung = elevated hemidiaphragms on CXR, FVC reduced; responds to immunosuppression. DAH = life-threatening β€” pulse CS + CYC Β± plasmapheresis
GILupus enteritis (mesenteric vasculitis), serositis (ascites, peritonitis), esophageal dysmotility, pancreatitis, hepatitis (lupoid)Lupus enteritis: abdominal pain, diarrhea; CT abdomen β†’ "target sign" (bowel wall thickening + enhancement), dilated loops; responds to CS
OphthalmicRetinal vasculitis, episcleritis, secondary SjΓΆgren's sicca, HCQ retinopathyHCQ retinopathy: screen with funduscopy + visual field at baseline, then annually after 5 years (or sooner if >5 mg/kg/day)
⚑ High-Yield NPSLE Points
  • Stroke in SLE β†’ always exclude APS (lupus anticoagulant, anti-cardiolipin, anti-Ξ²2GP1)
  • Seizures in SLE: may be APS-related (thrombosis) or inflammatory; treat accordingly
  • Transverse myelitis in SLE β†’ APS-related or inflammatory; often anti-aquaporin-4 negative
  • Cognitive dysfunction ("lupus fog") β€” most common NPSLE; may persist in remission
2.4 Lupus Nephritis β€” ISN/RPS 2018 Classification & Treatment

LN occurs in 30–60% of SLE patients. Biopsy is essential for classification and treatment decisions. ISN/RPS 2018 revision introduced NIH Activity Index (AI 0–24) and Chronicity Index (CI 0–12) to replace the A/C subclassification.

ClassPathologyClinical PresentationTreatment Strategy
IMinimal mesangial LN (normal LM)Normal UA; incidental findingTreat underlying SLE only; HCQ always
IIMesangial proliferative LNMild proteinuria (<1g/day), microscopic hematuriaLow-dose CS + HCQ; if heavy proteinuria add MMF 1–2 g/day
IIIFocal proliferative LN (<50% glomeruli; endocapillary+/βˆ’ extracapillary proliferation)Proteinuria, hematuria, HTN; variable AKIInduction + Maintenance (see below)
IVDiffuse proliferative LN (β‰₯50% glomeruli) β€” most severe; wire-loop lesions, crescentsNephrotic + nephritic syndrome, HTN, ↑Cr, RBC castsInduction + Maintenance (see below)
VMembranous LN (subepithelial immune deposits); may coexist with III/IVNephrotic syndrome; AKI uncommon; thrombosis risk (APS)MMF Β± CS (first-line); resistant: CNI (tacrolimus/voclosporin) or rituximab; antithrombotic if nephrotic
VIAdvanced sclerotic LN (>90% globally sclerosed glomeruli)Chronic renal failure, low-grade proteinuriaConservative; RAS blockade; prepare for RRT/transplant
⚑ LN Class III/IV β€” Induction & Maintenance (EULAR 2023 / KDIGO 2024)
  • Step 0 (all LN): HCQ β€” continue in ALL LN patients (reduces flares, improves complete renal response); RAS blockade (ACEI/ARB) for proteinuria; monitor BP, lipids
  • Induction (6 months) β€” choose anchor drug:
  • Option A β€” MMF-based (preferred by EULAR 2023): MMF 2–3 g/day + pulse methylprednisolone 250–1000 mg Γ— 1–3 days β†’ oral prednisone 0.5–1 mg/kg/day, taper to ≀7.5 mg/day by 3–6 months
  • Option B β€” CYC-based: Euro-Lupus low-dose CYC (500 mg IV q2wk Γ— 6 doses; total 3 g) OR NIH high-dose CYC (0.5–1 g/mΒ² IV monthly Γ— 6) β€” preferred in severe crescentic LN or Asian populations
  • ALMS Trial: MMF = CYC for induction (class III, IV, V); 24-week primary endpoint; similar CR rates (~22% each)
  • Euro-Lupus Trial: Low-dose CYC non-inferior to high-dose CYC with less toxicity (leukopenia, infection, premature ovarian failure)
  • ADD-ON Biologics (EULAR 2023 Recommendation):
  • + Belimumab IV 10 mg/kg monthly (after 3 loading doses) or SC 200 mg weekly: BLISS-LN β€” primary renal response 43% vs 32% (p=0.03); ↓ risk of renal events/death by 49%
  • + Voclosporin 23.7 mg BID: AURORA-1 β€” complete renal response at 52 weeks 41% vs 23% (p<0.001); triple therapy = MMF + voclosporin + low-dose CS
  • Note: Belimumab + CYC = NOT recommended (increased infection risk in pivotal trials)
⚑ LN Maintenance Therapy
  • MMF 1–2 g/day β€” preferred maintenance (superior to AZA in MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial)
  • AZA 2 mg/kg/day β€” alternative; preferred in pregnancy
  • Duration: minimum 36 months (EULAR 2023); consider longer if anti-dsDNA remains elevated or C3/C4 persistently low
  • GC target: ≀5 mg/day prednisone in maintenance; withdraw if possible
  • Continue voclosporin or belimumab add-on during maintenance if used in induction
TrialRegimenKey ResultYear
AURORA-1Voclosporin 23.7mg BID + MMF + low-dose CS vs MMF + CSCRR 41% vs 23% at Wk52 (p<0.001); FDA approved Jan 20212021
AURORA-2Voclosporin long-term extension (24 months total)Sustained renal response maintained; no new safety signals2022
BLISS-LNBelimumab 10mg/kg IV + SOC vs SOC; 104 wksPRR 43% vs 32% (p=0.03); ↓ renal events/death 49%2020
NOBILITYObinutuzumab 1000mg Γ— 2 + MMF + CS; Phase 2CRR 35% vs 23% (Wk52); 41% vs 23% (Wk104)2022
REGENCYObinutuzumab Phase 3 confirmatory RCTCRR 46.4% vs 33.1% (Wk76); NEJM 20252025
ALMSMMF 3g/d vs NIH-CYC; 24 wks; n=370 class III-VMMF = CYC for induction (non-inferior); MMF superior in maintenance2009
Euro-LupusLow-dose CYC 500mg q2wkΓ—6 vs high-dose CYCNon-inferior efficacy; less toxicity; endorsed by EULAR2002/2010
πŸ”Ά Obinutuzumab vs Rituximab in LN: Obinutuzumab is a next-generation anti-CD20 (type II, glycoengineered) with 35Γ— more potent B-cell depletion than rituximab via ADCC. REGENCY (Phase 3, NEJM 2025): CRR 46.4% vs 33.1% at Wk76 with prednisone tapering. Rituximab remains off-label but widely used for refractory LN; LUNAR trial (2012) was negative, but real-world data supports use. EULAR 2023 allows rituximab for LN refractory to standard treatments.
πŸ”Ά ISN/RPS 2018 Key Changes from 2003: (1) Replaced A/C subclasses with modified NIH Activity Index (AI) and Chronicity Index (CI); AI predicts response to therapy, CI predicts long-term renal function loss. (2) Crescents threshold lowered to β‰₯10% of glomerular circumference. (3) "Lupus podocytopathy" recognized (Class not assigned; minimal change/FSGS pattern; heavy proteinuria without immune deposits β†’ CNI-responsive). (4) Fibrous crescents added to CI.
2.5 SLE Autoantibody Profile
AntibodySensitivitySpecificityClinical Association / Pearls
ANA95–99%57% (low)Screening test; positive in many non-SLE conditions. ANA β‰₯1:80 = EULAR/ACR 2019 entry criterion. β‰₯1:160 more specific
Anti-dsDNA60–70%95–99%Disease activity marker; ↑ titers + ↓ C3/C4 = serologic flare β†’ predict LN flare; Farr radioimmunoassay most specific; ELISA for screening
Anti-Sm25–30%~99%Highly specific for SLE (pathognomonic); does NOT correlate with disease activity. Part of U1-snRNP complex. Positive anti-Sm β†’ high likelihood of SLE diagnosis
Anti-Ro/SSA25–35%ModerateNeonatal lupus (skin rash, CCHB β€” complete congenital heart block 2–3%); SCLE; secondary SjΓΆgren's; photosensitivity; anti-Ro+ β†’ fetal echo surveillance 18–26 wks gestation
Anti-La/SSB10–15%HighUsually with anti-Ro; neonatal lupus; secondary SjΓΆgren's; presence of anti-La without anti-Ro is unusual; lower LN risk
Anti-U1-RNP25–35%ModerateMCTD (very high titer), PAH in SLE/MCTD, Raynaud's; "overlap" serologies
Anti-histone50–70%LowDrug-induced lupus >95%; also in idiopathic SLE (not specific). Test when clinical context suggests DIL
Anti-C1q30–40%High for LNCorrelates with active LN and hypocomplementemia; useful to monitor LN activity alongside anti-dsDNA + C3/C4
Anti-P ribosomal10–20%~95%NPSLE (psychosis, cognitive), lupus hepatitis; present in active disease; more common in Asian patients
Anti-Ξ²2GP1, aCL, LAVariableHigh (LA most specific)Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) β€” thrombosis, pregnancy morbidity; test all SLE patients; 30–40% SLE have aPL; 10–15% develop APS
⚑ Monitoring SLE Activity with Serology
  • Anti-dsDNA + C3/C4 = standard activity monitoring panel
  • ↑ anti-dsDNA + ↓ C3 + ↓ C4 = serological flare β†’ anticipate clinical flare in 2–4 weeks
  • Low C3 and C4 in parallel: Classical pathway consumption (typical of SLE LN); low C3 alone: alternative pathway activation (infections, other)
  • Anti-Sm and anti-Ro: stable (not activity markers); use for diagnosis and risk stratification only
  • Periodic aPL re-testing: if initially negative, retest during disease flares as aPL may become detectable
2.6 EULAR 2023 Treatment Principles & Treat-to-Target
πŸ“š Source: Fanouriakis A, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of SLE: 2023 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2024;83:15–29. (DOI: 10.1136/ard-2023-224762)
⚑ 5 Overarching Principles (EULAR 2023)
  • 1. Treat-to-Target (T2T): Aim for DORIS remission or LLDAS (Lupus Low Disease Activity State) at every clinic visit
  • 2. HCQ universally: Hydroxychloroquine for ALL SLE patients (unless contraindicated β€” retinopathy, severe renal failure); dose ≀5 mg/kg/day; reduces flares, organ damage accrual, thrombosis, mortality, and improves biologic response
  • 3. GC minimisation: Use GC as bridging therapy; target ≀5 mg prednisone/day for maintenance; withdraw when possible; GC-related damage is a major source of long-term morbidity
  • 4. Early ISD/biologic initiation: Prompt start of immunosuppressives (MTX, AZA, MMF) AND/OR biologics (belimumab, anifrolumab) to control disease and enable GC taper
  • 5. Preventive care: Vaccinations (influenza, pneumococcal, COVID-19; live vaccines avoided if immunocompromised), osteoporosis prophylaxis (Ca+D, bisphosphonates if GC β‰₯7.5 mg/day >3 months), CV risk reduction, cancer screening
⚑ DORIS Remission & LLDAS Definitions
  • DORIS Remission (2021): Clinical SLEDAI-2K = 0 (excluding serology items: anti-dsDNA, complement) + Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) <0.5 + Prednisone ≀5 mg/day + stable maintenance IS/biologic dose. If only on HCQ with no IS = "remission off treatment"
  • LLDAS (Lupus Low Disease Activity State): SLEDAI-2K ≀4 (no major organ involvement) + PGA ≀1 + Prednisone ≀7.5 mg/day + no new disease activity. More attainable than DORIS remission; associated with reduced organ damage accrual
  • Clinical relevance: Both DORIS and LLDAS are now trial endpoints; achieving LLDAS for β‰₯50% of follow-up time strongly associated with less organ damage (Lupus Low Disease Activity State Working Group)
  • Serology without activity: "Serologically active, clinically quiescent" (SACQ) β€” elevated anti-dsDNA and/or low complement without symptoms β†’ watchful waiting, HCQ optimization, consider belimumab to reduce risk of organ-threatening flare
Disease ManifestationFirst-Line TherapyEscalation / Second-Line
Mild-Moderate (skin, joints, serositis)HCQ + short-course GC; MTX (skin, joints); Dapsone (bullous lupus)+ Belimumab or anifrolumab; AZA; MMF (skin)
Active LN (III/IV/V)MMF 2–3g/day OR Euro-Lupus CYC + pulse methylprednisolone + HCQ+ Belimumab (BLISS-LN) or voclosporin (AURORA); obinutuzumab (REGENCY)
Neuropsychiatric SLEIf inflammatory: high-dose CS Β± CYC; if APS-related: anticoagulationRituximab for refractory; plasma exchange for severe (DAH, TTP-like)
Hematologic (severe ITP, AIHA)High-dose GC Β± IVIg; HCQRituximab; splenectomy; AZA; CYC; eltrombopag (ITP)
Refractory/Steroid-dependentHCQ + IS + biologic (belimumab or anifrolumab)CAR-T cell therapy (investigational but increasingly used 2024–2025)
πŸ”Ά GC Taper Strategy (EULAR 2023): Induction: prednisone 0.5–1 mg/kg/day β†’ taper 10% every 2 weeks once disease controlled β†’ target ≀7.5 mg/day by 3 months β†’ ≀5 mg/day by 6 months β†’ withdraw if possible. Cumulative GC >10g (lifetime) associated with significant organ damage (Sj's damage index); avoid prolonged >7.5 mg/day. Use IS/biologics to enable taper.
2.7 Biologic Therapies in SLE β€” EULAR 2023 Tier
DrugTargetIndicationKey TrialNotes
Belimumab (Benlysta)BLyS/BAFF (soluble; B-cell survival)Active SLE (non-LN) + active LN (BLISS-LN); IV or SCBLISS-52, BLISS-76, BLISS-LNMost effective when anti-dsDNA+, low complement; approved 2011 (SLE), 2020 (LN); SC 200mg/wk or IV 10mg/kg q4wk
Anifrolumab (Saphnelo)IFNAR1 (type I IFN receptor)Moderate-severe SLE (non-LN); skin, musculoskeletal diseaseTULIP-1, TULIP-2TULIP-2: BICLA response 47.8% vs 31.5%; approved 2021; IV 300mg q4wk; NOT for LN; herpes zoster ↑ risk (7%)
Voclosporin (Lupkynis)Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) β€” novel modifiedActive LN class III/IV/V (add-on to MMF)AURORA-1, AURORA-2First oral therapy approved for LN (FDA Jan 2021); CRR 41% vs 23%; does not require dose adjustment for GFR; monitor BP, potassium, drug interactions (CYP3A4)
Rituximab (off-label)CD20 (B-cell depletion, type I anti-CD20)Refractory SLE, LN, severe cytopenias, NPSLELUNAR (negative), real-world dataLUNAR RCT negative (2012); widely used off-label; EULAR 2023 allows as second-line LN; 375mg/mΒ² Γ—4 or 1gΓ—2 doses
Obinutuzumab (Gazyva)CD20 (type II, glycoengineered β†’ ↑↑ B-cell killing)Active LN (emerging; REGENCY Phase 3 positive)NOBILITY, REGENCY35Γ— more potent B-cell depletion than rituximab; REGENCY: CRR 46.4% vs 33.1% (Wk76); not yet FDA approved for LN as of early 2025; likely approval pending
⚑ Anifrolumab β€” TULIP Trials Key Data
  • TULIP-1: Primary endpoint SRI-4 β€” NOT met; BICLA favored anifrolumab; primary endpoint failure due to GC taper rules
  • TULIP-2: Primary endpoint BICLA β€” MET; BICLA 47.8% vs 31.5% (difference 16.3%); skin disease ↓ (CLASI-50 response), GC taper success ↑, fewer flares
  • IFN-high subgroup benefits more (75–80% of SLE patients have IFN signature)
  • Safety: herpes zoster ↑ (7.2% vs 1.1%); all cutaneous/manageable; influenza ↑ (use with caution); pregnancy contraindicated; live vaccines contraindicated
  • Subcutaneous formulation (150mg q2wk SC) approved 2024 (Phase 3 positive) β€” convenience advantage
  • NOT effective/recommended for LN β€” LN patients excluded from pivotal trials; IFN-blockade may impair renal immune defense
⚑ Belimumab Practical Pearls
  • Best responders: anti-dsDNA positive + low complement + high SLEDAI at baseline
  • Latency: clinical benefit often apparent at 6 months; continue 12+ months for full assessment
  • SC belimumab 200mg/week = IV efficacy; home self-injection advantage
  • Reduce flares: 50% reduction in severe SLE flares vs placebo (BLISS-52/76 pooled)
  • Caution with rituximab combination β€” not recommended (increased infection in trials)
  • BLISS-LN long-term: continued renoprotection at 24 months; consider lifelong in high-risk LN
2.8 Emerging Therapies β€” CAR-T & Beyond (2024–2025)
πŸ“š Landmark References: Mougiakakos D et al. CD19 CAR-T for refractory SLE. NEJM 2021;385:567–9 (case letter); Mackensen A et al. Anti-CD19 CAR-T in refractory SLE. Nature Med 2022;28:2124–32 (n=5); MΓΌller F et al. CD19 CAR-T in autoimmune disease (n=15 incl. SLE). NEJM 2024;390:687–700; Systematic review: 47 SLE patients, LLDAS 81%. REGENCY (obinutuzumab) Phase 3 NEJM 2025.
⚑ Anti-CD19 CAR-T Cell Therapy in Refractory SLE
  • Rationale: SLE is driven by pathogenic autoreactive B-cells. CAR-T cells engineered to express anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor β†’ deep, durable B-cell depletion β†’ "immune reset" β†’ drug-free remission
  • Mougiakakos/Mackensen group (University of Erlangen), Nature Medicine 2022: 5 patients with refractory SLE (median age 22y, median disease duration 4y, failed multiple IS); all received autologous anti-CD19 CAR-T cells; all 5 achieved drug-free remission at up to 17 months follow-up; serological normalization (anti-dsDNA↓, C3/C4 normalised)
  • NEJM 2024 (MΓΌller F et al.): Expanded series including SLE, systemic sclerosis, myositis, APS-related; n=15 patients; CAR-T safe (mostly grade 1–2 CRS); all SLE patients achieved DORIS remission; one patient maintained remission off all therapy at 29 months
  • Systematic review 2024: 47 SLE patients across 10 studies β†’ 81% achieved LLDAS; 80% achieved serological remission; CRS in 87% (mostly grade 1–2); ICANS in 1 patient (mild)
  • Allogeneic CAR-T (off-the-shelf): Cell Med 2025 β€” first allogeneic anti-CD19 CAR-T in refractory SLE achieving durable remission; addresses manufacturing time barrier
  • Current status: Investigational; compassionate use / early Phase 1–2 trials; not standard of care but may be considered for truly refractory SLE (failed β‰₯2 biologics); active clinical trials ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov)
TherapyTargetStageStatus 2025
Anti-CD19 CAR-TCD19 (B-cells)Phase 1–2; compassionate useLandmark remissions; not standard of care
ObinutuzumabCD20 (type II)Phase 3 (REGENCY)NEJM 2025 positive; FDA approval pending for LN
Dapirolizumab pegolCD40L (blocks T-B costimulation)Phase 3 (PHOENYCS GO/FLY)Positive phase 3 data 2024; regulatory submission
TelitaciceptBLyS + APRIL (dual inhibitor)Phase 3 (China-approved)Approved in China 2023; Western trials ongoing
DeucravacitinibTYK2 inhibitorPhase 2 (PAISLEY)PAISLEY Phase 2 positive; Phase 3 enrolling
Ianalumab (VAY736)BAFF-R (B-cell surface)Phase 3Phase 3 trials ongoing; Phase 2 positive in SLE
πŸ”Ά CAR-T in SLE β€” Board Exam Perspective: Know the basic concept (anti-CD19 autologous CAR-T β†’ deep B-cell depletion β†’ drug-free remission) and that it is used for truly refractory SLE. Not standard of care yet. Published in high-impact journals (NEJM, Nature Medicine) 2021–2024. Main concerns: CRS (cytokine release syndrome β€” managed with tocilizumab), ICANS (neurotoxicity β€” rare), infection risk during aplasia, manufacturing time (2–4 weeks for autologous). Distinguish from allogeneic (off-the-shelf) which is faster but may have graft-vs-host issues.
2.9 Pregnancy in SLE

SLE pregnancy is high-risk: 2–4Γ— increased risk of preeclampsia, IUGR, prematurity, fetal loss, and neonatal lupus. Optimal conception: β‰₯6 months of quiescent disease (SLEDAI ≀4, no active LN, prednisolone ≀10 mg/day). Multidisciplinary care (rheumatology + obstetrics + neonatology).

⚑ Drug Safety in SLE Pregnancy
  • HCQ β€” βœ… CONTINUE throughout pregnancy; reduces flares during pregnancy by 2–3Γ—; reduces CHB recurrence risk in anti-Ro+ mothers; EULAR 2017 strongly recommends continuation
  • Prednisone β€” βœ… Safe ≀20 mg/day; fluorinated steroids (dexamethasone, betamethasone) cross placenta and suppress fetal HPA axis β†’ use only for fetal indications (lung maturity, fetal CHB hydrops)
  • Azathioprine β€” βœ… Safe (fetal liver lacks inosinate pyrophosphorylase to convert AZA to active metabolite); preferred steroid-sparing agent in pregnancy; dose ≀2 mg/kg/day
  • Tacrolimus β€” βœ… Generally safe (limited data); used for refractory LN in pregnancy; monitor fetal growth, neonatal hypoglycaemia
  • Low-dose aspirin (LDA) β€” βœ… From 12 weeks gestation for preeclampsia prevention (especially if prior LN, APS, APLA+)
  • LMWH β€” βœ… For APS in pregnancy (aspirin + LMWH throughout pregnancy); do NOT use warfarin in first trimester (teratogenic)
  • MMF (mycophenolate) β€” ❌ CONTRAINDICATED; teratogenic (microtia, cleft palate, cardiac malformations β€” "mycophenolate embryopathy"); stop β‰₯3 months before conception; switch to AZA
  • CYC (cyclophosphamide) β€” ❌ CONTRAINDICATED; teratogenic; if essential (DAH, severe NPSLE), delay until β‰₯14 weeks; prefer rituximab as alternative
  • MTX, LEF β€” ❌ CONTRAINDICATED; folate antagonists (MTX); LEF washout with cholestyramine before conception
  • Belimumab, Anifrolumab β€” ❌ Insufficient pregnancy safety data; discontinue before conception; not recommended
⚑ Neonatal Lupus & Congenital Heart Block (CHB)
  • Risk factor: Anti-Ro/SSA positive mother (anti-La/SSB additional risk)
  • CHB prevalence: 2–3% of anti-Ro+ pregnancies (incomplete AV block: up to 5%)
  • Fetal cardiac monitoring: Echocardiogram every 1–2 weeks from weeks 16–26 (highest risk period for PR prolongation β†’ complete CHB)
  • PR prolongation detected: Start dexamethasone 4 mg/day (fluorinated steroid crosses placenta) β€” may reverse 1st/2nd degree block; complete (3rd degree) CHB irreversible β†’ pacemaker after birth
  • Neonatal skin lupus: Transient; disappears by 6–8 months as maternal antibodies clear
  • HCQ protective: Recent meta-analyses show HCQ continuation during pregnancy reduces CHB risk in anti-Ro+ mothers by ~60%
  • CHB recurrence risk: 10–20% if prior affected child; consider prophylactic dexamethasone and close surveillance
Risk FactorMaternal / Fetal Outcome Risk
Active LN at conception↑↑ Preeclampsia, renal failure, fetal loss, preterm birth
Anti-Ro/SSA positiveCHB 2–3%, neonatal lupus rash (transient)
Antiphospholipid antibodiesRecurrent pregnancy loss, preeclampsia, thrombosis, IUGR
Hypertension pre-pregnancySuperimposed preeclampsia risk ↑↑
High-dose GC use (>20 mg/day)Gestational diabetes, preterm PROM, adrenal suppression (fetal)
πŸ”Ά When to Conceive β€” EULAR Guidance: Counsel to plan conception during β‰₯6 months of clinical remission (SLEDAI-2K ≀4, no active LN, off teratogenic drugs β‰₯3 months, prednisone ≀10 mg/day). Pregnancy itself can trigger SLE flare (flare rate ~40% during pregnancy), often responds to GC adjustment. High-risk features (prior severe LN, APS, uncontrolled HTN) β†’ defer pregnancy until optimised.
2.10 Practice Questions
Q1. A 28-year-old woman with SLE on HCQ presents with proteinuria 3.5 g/24h, RBC casts, creatinine 1.8 mg/dL. Renal biopsy: diffuse proliferative GN (Class IV) with activity index 14/24, chronicity index 2/12. Which induction therapy combination aligns with EULAR 2023 recommendations for improved renal outcomes?
MMF 2–3 g/day + pulse methylprednisolone 500 mg Γ— 3 days β†’ oral prednisone + Add-on Belimumab (BLISS-LN) OR Voclosporin (AURORA)
EULAR 2023 recommends MMF-based induction (option A) with pulse GC for Class IV LN. Add-on belimumab (BLISS-LN: PRR 43% vs 32%; ↓ renal events/death 49%) or voclosporin (AURORA-1: CRR 41% vs 23%) should be considered for high-risk features (high proteinuria, high activity index). HCQ should be continued throughout. Maintenance: MMF 1–2g/day for β‰₯36 months with GC taper to ≀5mg/day. Key point: obinutuzumab (REGENCY 2025) is emerging as another add-on option but not yet approved for LN.
Q2. A 32-year-old woman with SLE has persistent skin disease (CLASI score 18) and joint disease despite HCQ and prednisolone. Anti-dsDNA is positive, complement low. She has no renal involvement. Which biologic has the strongest evidence and is FDA-approved for her condition?
Anifrolumab (Saphnelo) β€” FDA approved 2021 for moderate-severe SLE
Anifrolumab (anti-IFNAR1) is specifically approved for moderate-severe SLE with skin and musculoskeletal disease. TULIP-2: BICLA response 47.8% vs 31.5% (p<0.001); skin response (CLASI-50) significantly better. Particularly effective in IFN-high patients (~75–80% of SLE). Given 300 mg IV q4wk. NOT recommended for lupus nephritis. Belimumab is an alternative (approved for SLE + LN) but anifrolumab shows superior skin disease response. Key side effect: herpes zoster ↑ (prophylactic acyclovir recommended); avoid live vaccines.
Q3. A 25-year-old anti-Ro/SSA positive woman with SLE is 18 weeks pregnant. She is currently on HCQ and prednisolone 5 mg/day. Fetal echocardiogram shows PR interval prolongation (first-degree AV block). What is the most appropriate next step?
Start Dexamethasone 4 mg/day and intensify fetal cardiac monitoring (weekly echo)
First-degree CHB detected in anti-Ro+ pregnancy should prompt fluorinated steroid (dexamethasone) initiation, which can cross the placenta (unlike prednisone) and may reverse 1st/2nd degree block. Complete 3rd degree CHB is irreversible and requires pacemaker after birth. Continue HCQ (reduces CHB risk and flares). Weekly echocardiogram during 16–26 week window (highest risk period). Key distinction: prednisone does NOT cross the placenta (metabolised by placental 11Ξ²-HSD2); dexamethasone and betamethasone DO cross β†’ use only for fetal indications.
Q4. According to EULAR 2023, what is the treatment target in SLE, and what are the two main definitions used?
Treat-to-Target: DORIS Remission OR LLDAS (Lupus Low Disease Activity State)
EULAR 2023 establishes treat-to-target (T2T) as a fundamental principle. DORIS Remission (2021 update): Clinical SLEDAI-2K = 0 + PGA <0.5 + prednisone ≀5 mg/day + stable IS/biologic. LLDAS: SLEDAI-2K ≀4 (no major organ activity) + PGA ≀1 + prednisone ≀7.5 mg/day + no new major activity. LLDAS is more attainable; achieving LLDAS β‰₯50% of follow-up time = significantly less organ damage accrual (Sj's score). Both are now used as primary endpoints in RCTs. GC ≀5 mg/day is the target for long-term maintenance in both definitions.
Q5. A 30-year-old woman with severe refractory SLE (failed HCQ, MMF, AZA, belimumab, rituximab) presents with ongoing disease activity. She read about CAR-T cell therapy for SLE. What is the mechanism, current evidence level, and main safety concern?
Autologous anti-CD19 CAR-T cells β†’ deep B-cell depletion β†’ drug-free remission. Evidence: Phase 1–2 (Nature Medicine 2022, NEJM 2024). Main risk: Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS).
Mechanism: Patient's T-cells engineered ex vivo with anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor β†’ infused after lymphodepletion (fludarabine + cyclophosphamide) β†’ eliminate all CD19+ B-cells (including autoreactive clones) β†’ "immune reset" with B-cell reconstitution of tolerant naive repertoire. Evidence: Mackensen et al. (Nature Medicine 2022) β€” 5 patients, all achieved drug-free remission up to 17 months; MΓΌller et al. (NEJM 2024) β€” 15 patients across autoimmune diseases, CAR-T safe. 47-patient systematic review 2024: 81% LLDAS, serological remission in 80%. Safety: CRS in 87% (mostly grade 1–2; managed with tocilizumab); ICANS in 1 patient; infectious risk during aplasia. Status: investigational, not standard of care β€” compassionate use or clinical trials only.

3. Spondyloarthropathies (SpA)

Spondyloarthropathies are a family of inflammatory arthritides sharing HLA-B27 association, axial and/or peripheral joint involvement, enthesitis, and extra-articular features (uveitis, psoriasis, IBD). Classified as axial SpA (axSpA) or peripheral SpA.

3.1 Classification & SpA Family Overview
SubtypeKey FeaturesHLA-B27
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)Axial: sacroiliitis + spondylitis; bamboo spine; uveitis (AAU)90–95%
Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)Dactylitis, enthesitis, DIP involvement, asymmetric; psoriasis40–50%
Reactive ArthritisPost-infectious (GU: Chlamydia; GI: Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter); Reiter triad: urethritis + conjunctivitis + arthritis60–80%
IBD-associated SpAPeripheral (correlates with IBD activity) vs axial (independent); UC/CD25–75%
nr-axSpAMRI sacroiliac inflammation without X-ray sacroiliitis; predominantly female; good response to biologics50–70%
DISHNot true SpA; flowing anterior osteophytes; older males, DM; no inflammatory signsNo assoc.
πŸ”Ά HLA-B27 Utility: Prevalence in general population ~8–10% (Thai: ~5%). Sensitivity for AS ~90%; specificity ~90% for AS in low-prevalence group. Positive predictive value depends on clinical context. Not diagnostic alone β€” always combine with clinical + imaging.
3.2 Ankylosing Spondylitis β€” Clinical Features & Diagnosis

Classic presentation: Young male (<45 years), insidious back pain >3 months, improved with exercise (not rest), worse in morning (inflammatory back pain). Schober's test <5 cm expansion.

⚑ ASAS 2009 Axial SpA Classification Criteria (for patients with β‰₯3 months back pain, age onset <45y)
  • Imaging arm: Sacroiliitis on imaging (X-ray grade β‰₯2 bilateral or grade 3–4 unilateral; OR MRI active sacroiliitis) + β‰₯1 SpA feature
  • Clinical arm: HLA-B27 positive + β‰₯2 SpA features
  • SpA features: Inflammatory back pain, arthritis, enthesitis (heel), uveitis, dactylitis, psoriasis, Crohn's/UC, good response to NSAIDs, family history SpA, HLA-B27, elevated CRP

Extra-articular manifestations: Anterior uveitis (AAU) most common (25–40%); acute, unilateral, painful, photophobia; IBD (5–10%); psoriasis; aortic regurgitation (1–4%); apical pulmonary fibrosis (late, rare); cardiac conduction defects.

⚑ AS Radiographic Features (Dr. Paijit β€” XR Handout)
  • Sacroiliac joints: Early: pseudo-widening β†’ subchondral sclerosis β†’ erosions β†’ ankylosis (grade 0–4 modified New York)
  • Romanus lesion: Inflammatory corner erosion at vertebral endplate ("shiny corner" on MRI)
  • Squaring of vertebral bodies: Loss of anterior concavity β†’ square shape
  • Syndesmophytes: Thin, vertical, marginal (vs DISH: thick, anterior, non-marginal)
  • Bamboo spine: Bridging syndesmophytes β†’ "bamboo" appearance on AP view
  • Dagger sign: Ossification of ALL + interspinous ligaments β†’ single central line on AP view
  • Trolley track sign: Bilateral facet joint + posterior ligament ossification β†’ 3 lines on AP view
3.3 Psoriatic Arthritis

Occurs in 20–30% of psoriasis patients. Skin precedes arthritis in 75%; simultaneous in 15%; arthritis first in 10%.

CASPAR criteria (2006): Inflammatory joint disease + β‰₯3 points: psoriasis (current 2pt / hx 1pt / family 1pt); nail changes (1pt); RF negative (1pt); dactylitis (1pt); juxta-articular new bone formation on X-ray (1pt).

⚑ PsA Patterns (5 subtypes β€” Moll & Wright)
  • DIP-predominant β€” associated with nail disease
  • Asymmetric oligoarthritis β€” most common; large + small joints; dactylitis (sausage digit)
  • Symmetric polyarthritis β€” resembles RA (but RFβˆ’, DIP+)
  • Axial SpA pattern β€” sacroiliitis, spondylitis; often asymmetric/skip lesions vs AS
  • Arthritis mutilans β€” severe; "opera glass" deformity; pencil-in-cup on X-ray
⚑ PsA Radiographic Features (Dr. Paijit)
  • Pencil-in-cup deformity: Erosion of distal end of proximal phalanx + periosteal reaction of distal phalanx
  • Mouse-ear osteophytes: Periosteal new bone at DIP margins
  • Opera glass (main en lorgnette): Severe telescoping of digits due to bone resorption β†’ arthritis mutilans
  • Periostitis/ankylosis of DIP (distinguishes from RA)
  • Unilateral/asymmetric sacroiliitis (vs bilateral/symmetric in AS)
3.4 SpA Treatment
DomainFirst-LineSecond-Line (bDMARD/tsDMARD)Notes
Axial SpA (AS/nr-axSpA)NSAIDs (continuous if active) + physiotherapyTNFi (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, golimumab, certolizumab); IL-17Ai (secukinumab, ixekizumab); JAKi (upadacitinib β€” approved axSpA)csDMARDs NOT effective for axial disease; no role for MTX/SSZ in axial
Peripheral SpA / PsANSAIDs; csDMARDs (MTX, LEF, SSZ) for peripheral joints onlyTNFi, IL-17Ai (ixekizumab preferred for skin + joint), IL-12/23i (ustekinumab), IL-23i (guselkumab, risankizumab), JAKi (upadacitinib, tofacitinib)IL-17i very effective for skin; TNFi for uveitis; avoid IL-17i in IBD-SpA (worsen IBD)
Reactive ArthritisNSAIDs; antibiotics only if active infection presentSSZ, MTX; TNFi for refractoryMost self-limiting; chronic in 10–20%
πŸ”Ά IL-17 inhibitors in IBD-SpA: Secukinumab and ixekizumab may worsen IBD (new onset or flare). Prefer TNFi (especially infliximab or adalimumab) in patients with SpA + IBD.

πŸ“š Key References β€” SpA

  • ASAS/EULAR 2022 axSpA Recommendations β€” Ramiro S et al., Ann Rheum Dis 2022
  • ACR/NPF 2018 PsA Guidelines β€” Singh JA et al., Arthritis Care Res 2019
  • MEASURE 1 β€” Secukinumab in AS (NEJM 2015)
  • SELECT-AXIS 1 β€” Upadacitinib in nr-axSpA (Lancet 2020)
3.5 Practice Questions
Q1. A 30-year-old man with HLA-B27+, 4 years of morning back stiffness, elevated CRP, and bilateral grade 2 sacroiliitis on X-ray fails 2 different NSAIDs over 12 weeks. Which therapy is next?
TNF inhibitor (e.g., adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab)
AS with inadequate response to β‰₯2 NSAIDs over 4 weeks each β†’ eligible for bDMARD. First choice: TNFi. IL-17Ai (secukinumab, ixekizumab) are alternative first-line biologics. csDMARDs (MTX) are NOT effective for axial disease. No need for MTX co-prescription with TNFi in AS.

4. Crystal Arthropathies

Crystal-induced arthropathies include gout (monosodium urate β€” MSU), pseudogout/CPPD (calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate), and basic calcium phosphate (BCP) deposition disease.

4.1 Gout β€” Pathogenesis & Epidemiology

Hyperuricemia: SUA >6.8 mg/dL (saturation point). Causes: ↑production (10%) β€” enzyme defects (HGPRT deficiency: Lesch-Nyhan), high purine diet, myeloproliferative disorders; ↓excretion (90%) β€” CKD, diuretics (thiazide > loop), low-dose ASA, CsA, pyrazinamide, ethanol.

Epidemiology: M:F = 4:1; peak age males 40–50y; females post-menopause (estrogen uricosuric). Prevalence increasing globally (diet, obesity, diuretics, CKD epidemic).

πŸ”Ά Tophus Formation: Monosodium urate crystals deposit in synovium, cartilage, bone, tendons, bursae. Gout stages: asymptomatic hyperuricemia β†’ acute gouty arthritis β†’ intercritical gout β†’ tophaceous gout. Not all hyperuricemia leads to gout.
4.2 Gout β€” Clinical Presentation & Diagnosis

Acute gout attack: Sudden-onset severe monoarthritis; first MTP (podagra) = 50% first attack, 90% lifetime. Also: ankle, midfoot, knee. Self-limiting 7–14 days. Triggers: alcohol, high-purine meal, dehydration, trauma, illness, rapid urate-lowering (initiation of ULT).

Synovial fluid analysis (gold standard): MSU crystals β€” needle-shaped, negatively birefringent (yellow under parallel polarizer). WBC 10,000–100,000 (PMN predominant).

⚑ Crystal Comparison
  • Gout (MSU): Needle-shaped, negatively birefringent (yellow parallel, blue perpendicular to slow ray)
  • CPPD (Pseudogout): Rhomboid/rod-shaped, positively birefringent (blue parallel, yellow perpendicular)
  • Mnemonic: "Negative = gNout; Positive = Pseudogout"

ACR 2015 Gout Classification Criteria: Score β‰₯8 = gout. Domains: pattern of joint/bursa involvement, symptomatic episode characteristics, time course, clinical evidence of tophi, serum urate, synovial fluid analysis, imaging evidence (ultrasound double contour sign, DECT urate, X-ray punched erosion).

4.3 Gout Radiographic Features (Dr. Paijit)
⚑ Gout X-ray Features (ABCDEF-SP)
  • A (Alignment): Usually preserved; deformity in advanced tophaceous gout
  • B (Bone density): Normal (preserved bone density β€” unlike RA)
  • C (Cartilage/joint space): Preserved until late
  • E (Erosions): Punched-out lytic lesions with sclerotic margins and overhanging (mushroom) margins β€” Martel's sign (pathognomonic for gout)
  • S (Soft tissue): Asymmetric soft tissue swelling; tophaceous deposits (calcified tophi in chronic)
  • Distinguishing from RA: No juxta-articular osteopenia; no marginal erosions; asymmetric; overhanging margins
  • Ultrasound: Double contour sign (urate crystals on articular cartilage surface); tophus with acoustic shadowing; power Doppler vascularity in acute attack
4.4 Gout Treatment β€” ACR 2020 Guidelines
⚑ Acute Gout Attack Management
  • Colchicine (preferred for most): Low-dose 1.2 mg stat β†’ 0.6 mg 1 hour later (non-inferior to high-dose, less GI toxicity β€” AGREE trial); reduce dose in renal impairment; avoid with P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors (clarithromycin, cyclosporine)
  • NSAIDs (indomethacin 50 mg TID, naproxen): Effective; avoid in CKD, GI disease, heart failure
  • Glucocorticoids: Oral prednisone 30–40 mg/day β†’ taper over 7–10 days; intra-articular for mono-/oligoarthritis; IV for severe/polyarticular
  • Start ULT during acute attack or defer 2–4 weeks (no evidence that starting during attack worsens outcome)
⚑ Urate-Lowering Therapy (ULT) β€” ACR 2020
  • Indications (strong): Tophi, β‰₯2 flares/year, stage β‰₯2 CKD, renal stones
  • Target SUA: <6 mg/dL (tophaceous: <5 mg/dL)
  • Allopurinol (first-line): Start low-dose 50–100 mg/day; titrate by 100 mg every 2–4 weeks; max 800–900 mg. Screen HLA-B*58:01 in Han Chinese, Thai, Korean (risk severe cutaneous reactions β€” SJS/TEN β€” prevalence ~8% Thai)
  • Febuxostat (second-line): 40–80 mg/day; avoid in CV disease (CARES trial: higher CV mortality vs allopurinol); suitable for allopurinol-intolerant or CKD
  • Probenecid (uricosuric): Second-line; avoid in kidney stones, CrCl <50; check URAT1 SLC22A12
  • Flare prophylaxis during ULT initiation: Colchicine 0.5–0.6 mg/day or low-dose NSAID for 3–6 months
  • Pegloticase (IV, recombinant uricase): For refractory tophaceous gout; infusion reactions; check for G6PD deficiency before use
πŸ”Ά HLA-B*58:01 Screening (Thai guideline): Before starting allopurinol in Thai, Han Chinese, or Korean patients: screen HLA-B*58:01. Positive (8% Thai) β†’ use febuxostat or benzbromarone instead. If allopurinol must be used, extreme caution. The risk of SJS/TEN in HLA-B*58:01 carriers treated with allopurinol is very high.
4.5 CPPD Disease (Pseudogout)

CPPD (calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate) deposition β€” affects cartilage, synovium, fibrocartilage. Increases with age (>60y).

Clinical presentations:

  • Acute CPPD arthritis (pseudogout): Knee most common (vs gout: first MTP); wrist, shoulder; self-limiting; triggers: surgery, illness, trauma, hypercalcemia
  • Chronic CPPD arthropathy: Resembles OA; can mimic RA (pseudo-RA) or neuropathic arthropathy

Secondary causes of CPPD (younger patients): Hyperparathyroidism (most important), hemochromatosis, hypomagnesemia, hypophosphatasia, hypothyroidism, ochronosis.

X-ray: Chondrocalcinosis β€” linear calcium deposits in fibrocartilage (menisci, symphysis pubis, triangular fibrocartilage of wrist, labrum) and hyaline cartilage (parallel to subchondral bone).

Synovial fluid: Rhomboid/rod-shaped crystals, positively birefringent.

Treatment: Acute: NSAIDs, colchicine, intra-articular/systemic steroids. Chronic: NSAIDs, HCQ, MTX, IL-1 inhibition (anakinra) for refractory. No disease-modifying agent available.

4.6 Practice Questions
Q1. A 55-year-old Thai male with CKD stage 2 and SUA 9.5 mg/dL has had 3 gout attacks in the past year. You plan to start allopurinol. What must you check first?
HLA-B*58:01 genotype
Thai patients have ~8% prevalence of HLA-B*58:01, which confers very high risk of allopurinol-induced SJS/TEN. Screen before initiating allopurinol. If positive β†’ use febuxostat (40–80 mg/day) or benzbromarone (uricosuric). Also add colchicine 0.5 mg/day prophylaxis for first 3–6 months when starting ULT. Target SUA <6 mg/dL.
Q2. An 80-year-old woman presents with acute swollen, hot knee. Synovial fluid shows 45,000 WBC/mmΒ³ (PMN), rhomboid crystals that are blue under parallel polarized light. What is the diagnosis and what secondary cause should be ruled out?
Acute CPPD arthritis (pseudogout) β€” Positive birefringence
Blue under parallel polarized light = positively birefringent = CPPD. Always rule out septic arthritis (send culture). In younger patients (<60y) with CPPD, screen for secondary causes: PTH, Ca, Mg, phosphatase, ferritin/transferrin saturation (hemochromatosis), TSH. In elderly, usually primary/age-related. Treatment: NSAID, colchicine, or intra-articular steroid.

5. Connective Tissue Diseases (CTDs)

CTDs include Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), SjΓΆgren's Syndrome, Mixed CTD (MCTD), and Undifferentiated CTD (UCTD). They share ANA positivity, multisystem involvement, and distinctive autoantibody profiles. (Source: Dr. Chayawee Muangchan, Siriraj/Mahidol)

5.1 Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) β€” Classification & Pathogenesis

SSc is characterized by three hallmarks: vasculopathy, autoimmunity, and fibrosis. F:M = 4:1; peak age 30–50y.

⚑ ACR/EULAR 2013 SSc Classification Criteria
  • Major criterion: Skin thickening of fingers proximal to MCP = 9 points (sufficient alone)
  • Skin thickening fingers: puffy/whole finger 4pt, only distal to MCP 2pt
  • Fingertip lesions: pitting scars 3pt, fingertip ulcers 2pt
  • Telangiectasia: 2pt
  • Abnormal NFC: 2pt
  • Pulmonary arterial HTN or ILD: 2pt each
  • Raynaud's phenomenon: 3pt
  • SSc-related Ab (anti-topoisomerase I, anti-centromere, anti-RNA pol III): 3pt
  • Score β‰₯9 = definite SSc
FeaturelcSSc (Limited)dcSSc (Diffuse)
Skin involvementDistal to elbows/knees + faceProximal limbs + trunk
Raynaud'sYears before skin changesCoincides with skin changes
mRSS (modified Rodnan skin score)Lower (<15)Higher (15–51)
Key antibodiesAnti-centromere (ACA)Anti-Scl-70 (anti-topoisomerase I), Anti-RNA pol III
ILDLess common (5–15%)Common (20–40%)
PAHMore common (10–15%)Less common
SRCRareMore common (anti-RNA pol III)
CREST syndromeCalcinosis, Raynaud's, Esophageal dysmotility, Sclerodactyly, Telangiectasiaβ€”
5.2 SSc β€” Organ Involvement & Complications
SystemFeaturesScreening/Management
Vascular/Raynaud'sVasospasm β†’ digital ischemia β†’ pitting scars β†’ digital ulcers β†’ amputation. NFC: enlarged/dropout capillaries (scleroderma pattern)Avoid cold/nicotine; CCB (nifedipine); PDE5i; IV prostacyclins for severe; bosentan for prevention of digital ulcers
SkinEdematous β†’ indurated β†’ atrophic. Salt-and-pepper, mat telangiectasia, calcinosismRSS monitoring; moisturizers; MTX/MMF for rapidly progressive skin
ILD (Pulmonary fibrosis)NSIP most common pattern (anti-Scl-70); UIP in some. Dry cough, dyspnea, bi-basal cracklesHRCT annually if at risk; PFT (FVC, DLCO); Treat: Nintedanib (SENSCIS trial) or MMF/CYC (SLS II); tocilizumab (fasciitis/ILD subset)
PAHProgressive exertional dyspnea; RHC required for diagnosis (mPAP β‰₯20 mmHg + PVR β‰₯2 WU)Annual screening: DETECT algorithm (anti-centromere, DLCO%, NT-proBNP, ECG, echo) β†’ RHC if indicated; ERA, PDE5i, prostacyclins
GIEsophageal dysmotility (90%) β†’ GERD, Barrett's, dysphagia; gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE/"watermelon stomach"); colonic hypomotility β†’ constipation, pseudo-obstruction; malabsorption (SIBO)PPI; prokinetics; endoscopy; rotating antibiotics for SIBO
CardiacPericarditis, myocarditis, arrhythmias, cardiac fibrosis (mRSS correlates). Conduction defectsECG, echo annually; Holter if symptomatic
Renal (SRC)Scleroderma Renal Crisis: acute severe HTN + AKI; abrupt onset; MAHA; 80% in dcSSc + anti-RNA pol III. HIGH DOSE STEROID = RISK FACTOR for SRCACE inhibitor IMMEDIATELY; monitor BP closely; avoid high-dose steroids if possible
πŸ”Ά SSc Disease Evolution (Dr. Chayawee timeline): Raynaud's β†’ (years) β†’ skin thickening β†’ (months–years) β†’ ILD/PAH/cardiac β†’ (years) β†’ atrophy. In dcSSc: rapid skin thickening in first 3–5 years then stabilizes/improves; ILD worst in first 4 years. Anti-RNA pol III+ β†’ higher SRC risk, more malignancy association.
5.3 SSc β€” Treatment Overview
ManifestationTreatmentEvidence
Skin (early diffuse)MTX (early dcSSc) or MMFModerate evidence
ILDMMF (first-line), CYC, NintedanibSLS I/II, SENSCIS
PAHERA (bosentan, ambrisentan, macitentan), PDE5i (sildenafil), prostacyclins (iloprost)Established RCT evidence
Raynaud's/Digital ulcersCCB (nifedipine), PDE5i, IV iloprost, bosentan (prevention)Multiple trials
SRCACE inhibitor STAT (captopril, lisinopril) β€” do NOT withhold even if AKIObservational; life-saving
GI (GERD)PPI; prokinetics (metoclopramide, domperidone)Symptomatic
5.4 SjΓΆgren's Syndrome

Chronic autoimmune exocrinopathy β€” predominantly affects exocrine glands (lacrimal, salivary). Primary (1Β°SS) vs secondary (2Β°SS in RA, SLE, SSc). F:M = 9:1; peak onset 30–50y.

Clinical: Xerophthalmia (dry eyes β€” keratoconjunctivitis sicca; Schirmer's test <5mm/5min), xerostomia (dry mouth β€” unstimulated saliva <1.5 mL/15min), parotid gland enlargement, extraglandular: arthritis, purpura, PNS, renal tubular acidosis, primary biliary cirrhosis overlap.

ACR/EULAR 2016 criteria: Total score β‰₯4 β€” lip biopsy focal lymphocytic sialadenitis focus score β‰₯1 foci/4mmΒ² (3pts), anti-SSA/Ro+ (3pts), ocular staining β‰₯5 (1pt), Schirmer's ≀5mm/5min (1pt), unstimulated salivary flow ≀0.1mL/min (1pt).

Antibodies: ANA (>90%), anti-Ro/SSA (70%), anti-La/SSB (50%), RF (60–70%). Anti-Ro+ alone can cause primary SS (without SLE).

Complications: Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (MALT type) β€” 44Γ— increased risk; most important long-term complication. Screen for B-symptoms, lymphadenopathy, parotid enlargement, low C4, cryoglobulins (risk factors).

⚑ Sjâgren's Treatment
  • Sicca symptoms: artificial tears/saliva, pilocarpine (muscarinic agonist, 5 mg TID), cevimeline
  • Extraglandular/systemic: HCQ (first-line), MTX, AZA, MMF
  • Severe/refractory: Rituximab (anti-CD20) β€” reduces lymphoma risk? trials ongoing
  • No FDA-approved disease-modifying therapy for primary SS
5.5 MCTD & UCTD

Mixed CTD (MCTD) β€” Sharp syndrome: Overlap of SLE + SSc + polymyositis features + anti-U1 RNP antibodies (high titer). Raynaud's universal; esophageal dysmotility; PAH major cause of mortality; synovitis; myositis. Treatment: like SLE; PAH management crucial.

Undifferentiated CTD (UCTD): ANA+ with CTD symptoms not fulfilling any specific criteria. ~30% remain UCTD long-term; ~30% evolve to defined CTD (SLE, SSc, SS) over 5 years. HCQ + symptom management; monitor for evolution.

πŸ”Ά CTD "Hand Features" Differential (Dr. Chayawee):
  • RA: MCP/PIP symmetric swelling, DIP sparing, ulnar drift, Z-thumb
  • SSc: Sclerodactyly, digital pitting scars, periungual telangiectasia, Raynaud's, calcinosis
  • SjΓΆgren's: Arthritis/arthralgia; mild synovitis; parotid swelling
  • SLE: Non-erosive; Jaccoud deformity; no true synovitis
  • DM: Mechanic's hands; Gottron papules on MCPs/PIPs; V-sign; shawl sign
5.6 Practice Questions
Q1. A patient with dcSSc is on prednisone 40 mg/day for rapidly progressive skin thickening. She develops acute severe hypertension (BP 185/110) and creatinine rise from 0.8 to 2.4 mg/dL over 1 week. What is the diagnosis and treatment?
Scleroderma Renal Crisis (SRC) β€” Start ACE inhibitor immediately
SRC: acute severe HTN + AKI in SSc. Anti-RNA pol III antibody and HIGH-DOSE STEROIDS (β‰₯15 mg/day prednisone) are the main risk factors. Treatment: ACE inhibitor IMMEDIATELY (captopril 25–50 mg TID or lisinopril) β€” do not withhold even if creatinine is rising. Target: BP normalization within 72h. Avoid ARBs (less evidence). ~30% will still require dialysis short-term but ACEi can lead to recovery of renal function even months later.

6. Inflammatory Myopathies (IIM)

Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies (IIM) are a heterogeneous group of systemic autoimmune diseases characterized by skeletal muscle inflammation, autoantibodies, and multisystem involvement. (Source: Dr. Chayawee Muangchan, Siriraj/Mahidol)

6.1 IIM Classification β€” 5 Major Subtypes
SubtypeKey FeaturesKey AntibodiesMalignancy Risk
Dermatomyositis (DM)Proximal muscle weakness + characteristic skin rashes (heliotrope, Gottron's); ILD commonAnti-Mi-2, anti-TIF1Ξ³, anti-NXP2, anti-MDA5, anti-SAEHigh (esp. anti-TIF1Ξ³, anti-NXP2 in adults)
Polymyositis (PM)Proximal muscle weakness without skin; less common than DM; now considered overlap/IMNMAnti-Jo-1 and other anti-synthetaseSlightly elevated
Immune-mediated Necrotizing Myopathy (IMNM)Severe proximal weakness; minimal inflammation on biopsy; necrosis + regeneration; statin-associatedAnti-SRP, anti-HMGCRElevated (anti-SRP)
Inclusion Body Myositis (IBM)Distal + proximal weakness (asymmetric); >50y; m>f; dysphagia; RESISTANT to treatmentAnti-cN1A (not diagnostic)Not elevated
Juvenile DM (JDM)Children; vasculopathy prominent; calcinosis; no malignancy riskAnti-MDA5, anti-NXP2, anti-TIF1Ξ³None
πŸ”Ά IBM Pearls: Most common inflammatory myopathy in patients >50y. Characteristic: finger flexor + quadriceps weakness (distal + proximal asymmetric). Dysphagia in ~50%. Does NOT respond to steroids or immunosuppressants. No proven disease-modifying treatment.
6.2 Myositis-Specific & Myositis-Associated Antibodies (MSA/MAA)
AntibodyTargetClinical Syndrome
Myositis-Specific Antibodies (MSA)
Anti-Jo-1Histidyl-tRNA synthetaseAntisynthetase syndrome: ILD + myositis + arthritis + mechanic's hands + Raynaud's + fever. Most common MSA (~25%)
Anti-PL-7, -12, -EJ, -OJ, -KSOther aminoacyl-tRNA synthetasesAntisynthetase syndrome (ILD more prominent than muscle in some)
Anti-MDA5MDA5 (melanoma differentiation antigen 5)Clinically amyopathic DM (CADM); rapidly progressive ILD; skin ulcers; palmar papules; HIGH mortality (RP-ILD)
Anti-TIF1Ξ³TIF1-gamma (transcription intermediary factor)Adult DM + high malignancy risk; classic DM rashes; photosensitivity
Anti-NXP2Nuclear matrix protein NXP2Adult DM + malignancy; calcinosis; edema; JDM
Anti-Mi-2Nucleosome remodelingClassic DM rashes (V-sign, shawl sign, Gottron's); good prognosis; responds well to steroids
Anti-SRPSignal recognition particleIMNM; severe acute proximal weakness; cardiac involvement; statin-independent
Anti-HMGCRHMG-CoA reductaseIMNM; statin-associated (but also statin-naΓ―ve); slower onset
Anti-SAESmall ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzymeDM with dysphagia; skin-predominant initially; European cohorts
Myositis-Associated Antibodies (MAA)
Anti-PM/Scl (Anti-PM-75/100)Exosome complexSSc-PM overlap; ILD; "mechanic's hands"; good prognosis
Anti-KuDNA-PK subunitPM/SSc overlap; ILD; PAH; arthritis
Anti-U1 RNPU1 snRNPMCTD; Raynaud's; myositis; SSc features
6.3 Dermatomyositis β€” Skin Features & Anti-MDA5
⚑ DM Pathognomonic & Characteristic Skin Rashes
  • Gottron's papules β€” violaceous papules over dorsal MCPs/PIPs/DIPs (pathognomonic)
  • Gottron's sign β€” erythematous/violaceous macular rash over extensor surfaces (elbows, knees)
  • Heliotrope rash β€” violaceous periorbital edema/erythema (pathognomonic)
  • V-sign β€” photosensitive erythema in V-neck distribution (anterior chest/neck)
  • Shawl sign β€” erythema over posterior shoulders/upper back
  • Holster sign β€” erythema over lateral thighs
  • Mechanic's hands β€” hyperkeratotic, cracked skin on lateral fingers (associated with antisynthetase syndrome)
  • Flagellate erythema β€” linear whip-like streaks on trunk
  • Calcinosis β€” calcium deposits in skin/subcutaneous tissue (esp. JDM, anti-NXP2)
  • Periungual telangiectasia β€” dilated capillaries at nail fold (NFC: irregular, dilated loops)
πŸ”Ά Anti-MDA5 DM (Clinically Amyopathic DM / CADM): Minimal or no muscle weakness; distinctive skin features β€” palmar papules (Gottron's over palms), skin ulcers, mucosal ulcers, painful palmar pitting. Rapidly progressive ILD (RP-ILD) is the key danger β€” mortality up to 50% within 6 months without aggressive treatment. TX: high-dose steroids + calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus/cyclosporine) + MMF or CYC; consider rituximab early.
6.4 IIM Workup & Diagnosis

Muscle enzymes: CK (most sensitive β€” may be markedly elevated in PM/IMNM, mildly elevated or normal in DM/CADM/IBM), aldolase, LDH, AST, ALT. CK normal in ~20% DM.

EMG: Myopathic pattern β€” short-duration, low-amplitude, polyphasic MUAPs; spontaneous activity (fibrillations, PSW); useful to guide biopsy site.

MRI (STIR/T2): Muscle edema = active inflammation; guides biopsy site; monitors treatment response.

Muscle biopsy: Gold standard. DM: perifascicular atrophy + perivascular/perimysial inflammation; PM: endomysial inflammation + CD8+ T cell invasion of non-necrotic fibers; IMNM: necrosis + regeneration + minimal inflammation; IBM: rimmed vacuoles + 15–18nm tubulofilamentous inclusions.

MSA panel: Essential for subtype diagnosis, prognosis, and ILD screening strategy.

Malignancy screening: All adult DM/IMNM (especially anti-TIF1Ξ³, anti-NXP2, anti-SRP): CT chest/abdomen/pelvis, mammography, PAP smear, PET-CT if suspicious. Screen at diagnosis and annually Γ—3 years.

ILD screening: HRCT + PFT (FVC, DLCO) at baseline β€” especially anti-Jo-1, anti-MDA5, anti-PL-7/12.

6.5 IIM Treatment
⚑ IIM Treatment Algorithm (Dr. Chayawee)
  • First-line: Prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day (max 60–80 mg/day); severe: IV pulse methylprednisolone 500–1000 mg Γ— 3 days
  • Early steroid-sparing agent (start simultaneously or within 4–8 weeks):
  • β€” Methotrexate 15–25 mg/week (preferred for skin/muscle; avoid if ILD)
  • β€” Azathioprine 2–3 mg/kg/day (preferred if ILD; slower onset)
  • β€” MMF 2–3 g/day (preferred for ILD and DM skin)
  • Refractory disease: IVIg 2 g/kg/month (especially DM; FDA-approved for DM β€” ProDERM trial); Rituximab (RIM trial β€” anti-Jo-1 and anti-Mi-2 best predictors of response)
  • Anti-MDA5 RP-ILD: Triple therapy β€” high-dose steroids + tacrolimus/cyclosporine + CYC; early rituximab
  • IMNM (anti-HMGCR/SRP): High-dose steroids + IVIG + RTX; stop statin if applicable
  • IBM: No proven treatment; PT/OT; dysphagia management; trial of IVIg for dysphagia

πŸ“š Key References β€” IIM

  • EULAR/ACR 2017 IIM Classification Criteria β€” Lundberg IE et al., Ann Rheum Dis 2017
  • ProDERM β€” IVIg for DM (NEJM 2022)
  • RIM trial β€” Rituximab in Myositis (Arthritis Rheum 2013)
  • BSR/BHPR 2017 IIM Guidelines β€” Oldroyd A et al.
6.6 Practice Questions
Q1. A 45-year-old woman has Gottron's papules, V-sign rash, and proximal muscle weakness. CK is 3,200 U/L. Anti-MDA5 is positive. She develops progressive dyspnea and HRCT shows bilateral ground-glass opacities with consolidation. What is the key concern and management?
Rapidly Progressive ILD (RP-ILD) in Anti-MDA5 DM β€” requires aggressive treatment
Anti-MDA5+ DM with RP-ILD is a rheumatologic emergency. Mortality >50% without aggressive therapy. Treatment: pulse methylprednisolone + tacrolimus (or cyclosporine) + IV cyclophosphamide. Consider early rituximab. Tofacitinib has emerging evidence for anti-MDA5 RP-ILD. ICU-level monitoring for respiratory failure; consider early intubation if needed. Anti-MDA5 patients may have minimal muscle weakness (CADM) despite severe systemic disease.
Q2. A 68-year-old man has 1 year of progressive weakness affecting finger flexors and quadriceps, more in the right side. CK is 450 U/L. EMG shows myopathic changes. Muscle biopsy shows rimmed vacuoles. What is the diagnosis and treatment?
Inclusion Body Myositis (IBM) β€” No proven disease-modifying treatment
IBM clues: >50 years, male, distal+proximal asymmetric weakness (finger flexors + quadriceps), rimmed vacuoles + 15–18nm inclusions on biopsy. IBM does NOT respond to steroids, MTX, or AZA. Management: PT/OT, fall prevention, dysphagia evaluation (videofluoroscopy), PEG if severe dysphagia. Anti-cN1A antibody seen in ~50% (not diagnostic alone). IVIg may temporarily improve dysphagia.

7. Systemic Vasculitis

Vasculitides are inflammatory disorders of blood vessel walls, classified by predominant vessel size (Chapel Hill Consensus Conference 2012). Recognition requires clinical pattern + ANCA + biopsy/imaging. This section incorporates EULAR 2022, ACR/VF 2021, and ACR/EULAR 2022 Classification Criteria with landmark trial evidence through 2024.

7.1 Chapel Hill 2012 Classification & ACR/EULAR 2022 Criteria
CategoryEntitiesKey VesselANCA
Large VesselTakayasu arteritis (TAK), Giant cell arteritis (GCA)Aorta + major branchesNegative
Medium VesselPolyarteritis nodosa (PAN), Kawasaki diseaseMuscular arteries (no glomerulonephritis)Negative
Small Vessel β€” ANCA+GPA, MPA, EGPACapillaries, venules, arterioles; glomeruliPositive
Small Vessel β€” IC-mediatedIgAV (HSP), Cryoglobulinemic, Anti-GBM (Goodpasture)Capillaries, venules; IC deposits on IFNegative
Variable VesselBehΓ§et's disease, Cogan's syndromeAny vessel sizeNegative
⚑ ACR/EULAR 2022 Classification Criteria β€” AAV (Ann Rheum Dis 2022)
  • New point-based scoring system; requires confirmation of vasculitis by biopsy/imaging AND exclusion of mimics
  • GPA (10 items): Upper airway (+3), bloody nasal discharge/nasal ulcers/sinusitis (+3), cartilage involvement (+2), hearing loss (+1), lung nodule/mass/cavitation (+2), granulomatous inflammation on biopsy (+3), PR3-ANCA positive (+5), MPO-ANCA negative (+1) β€” Threshold β‰₯5 (Sens 92.5%, Spec 93.8%)
  • MPA (6 items): Pauci-immune GN on biopsy (+5), fibrosis on HRCT (+3), MPO-ANCA positive (+6), PR3-ANCA negative (+1), no upper airway (+3), no granuloma (+3) β€” Threshold β‰₯5 (Sens 91.1%, Spec 93.9%)
  • EGPA (7 items): Obstructive airway disease (+3), nasal polyps (+3), eosinophilia β‰₯1Γ—10⁹/L (+5), extravascular eosinophils on biopsy (+2), granulomatous inflammation (+1), MPO-ANCA/PR3-ANCA positive (βˆ’3), no hematuria (βˆ’1) β€” Threshold β‰₯5 (Sens 84.9%, Spec 99.1%)
πŸ”Ά ANCA Testing: c-ANCA/PR3 specificity for GPA; p-ANCA/MPO for MPA & EGPA. Both indirect IF (ANCA pattern) AND antigen-specific ELISA (PR3/MPO) should be performed (ACR/EULAR 2022). PR3-ANCA = higher relapse rate, benefits more from extended RTX. MPO-ANCA = more likely MPA, associated with ILD, more fibrotic/less inflammatory phenotype.
7.2 Large Vessel Vasculitis β€” GCA & TAK (ACR/VF 2021, EULAR 2018, ACR/EULAR 2022 Criteria)
FeatureGCA (Giant Cell Arteritis)TAK (Takayasu Arteritis)
Age>50 years (mean 72y); increases with age<50 years (mostly 10–40y)
SexF:M = 3:1F:M = 8:1 (Asian women)
EthnicityNorthern European predominanceAsian, Middle Eastern, Latin American
VesselsExternal carotid branches (temporal, ophthalmic); extracranial aorta branches; thoracic aorta in LVV-GCA variantAorta & all major branches: subclavian (most common), carotid, renal, celiac, mesenteric; pulmonary arteries (PAH)
Key SymptomsNew temporal headache; scalp tenderness; jaw claudication; vision loss (AION); diplopia; PMR features (40–60%); constitutionalEarly: fever, myalgia, arthralgia, elevated APR. Late: absent pulses, BP discrepancy >10 mmHg arms, claudication, bruits, HTN (renal artery), angina (coronary)
LabESR >50 mm/hr; CRP markedly elevated; normocytic anemia; thrombocytosis; ANCA negativeESR/CRP elevated; ANCA negative; IL-6 elevated
DiagnosisTAB (gold standard; β‰₯1 cm; bilateral if first negative); Temporal artery US (halo sign); MRA/CTA/PET-CT for LVV-GCAMRA/CTA (aorta + branches): stenosis/occlusion/dilation/aneurysm; PET-CT: vessel wall FDG uptake (active inflammation); Angiography: gold standard for stenosis
PathologyGranulomatous inflammation: giant cells, lymphocytes in media; fragmented internal elastic lamina; skip lesions (30–40%)Granulomatous panarteritis; transmural inflammation; adventitial fibrosis
⚑ ACR/EULAR 2022 GCA Classification Criteria β€” Score-Based (Threshold β‰₯6)
  • Positive TAB or temporal artery halo sign on US: +5 (most weighted item)
  • ESR β‰₯50 mm/hr or CRP β‰₯10 mg/L: +3
  • Sudden visual loss: +3
  • Morning stiffness in shoulders or neck: +2
  • Jaw or tongue claudication: +2
  • New temporal headache: +2
  • Scalp tenderness: +2
  • Temporal artery abnormality on exam: +2
  • Bilateral axillary involvement on imaging: +2
  • FDG-PET activity throughout aorta: +2
  • Sensitivity 87.0%, Specificity 94.8% (Ponte et al., Arthritis Rheumatol 2022)
⚑ GCA Treatment β€” ACR/VF 2021 & EULAR 2018 Recommendations
  • IMMEDIATE GC (do NOT delay for biopsy):
  • β€” Cranial GCA without visual symptoms: Prednisolone 40–60 mg/day oral
  • β€” Cranial ischemia / visual threat: IV methylprednisolone 500–1000 mg Γ— 3 days THEN oral
  • β€” LVV-GCA / isolated aortitis: 40–60 mg/day oral (IV pulse less indicated)
  • Tocilizumab (IL-6Ri) β€” ACR 2021: Conditional recommendation to ADD TCZ to GC for all newly diagnosed GCA
  • β€” SC 162 mg/week OR IV 8 mg/kg q4wk (GiACTA trial, NEJM 2017)
  • β€” Sustained GC-free remission at 52 weeks: 56% TCZ-weekly vs 14% placebo/26-wk taper vs 18% placebo/52-wk taper
  • β€” Enables 26-week GC taper (shorter duration), markedly reduces cumulative GC dose
  • β€” Long-term extension: substantial drug-free remission maintenance after TCZ cessation (GiACTA open-label extension, 2024)
  • β€” TCZ added for: relapsing GCA, high GC toxicity risk, or as early combination (ACR 2021 conditional)
  • Methotrexate 15–25 mg/week: alternative steroid-sparer if TCZ unavailable/contraindicated (EULAR 2018)
  • Low-dose aspirin: No longer routinely recommended (EULAR 2018); use only if another cardiovascular indication exists
  • Taper GC slowly: prednisolone should not reach <5 mg before β‰₯12 months
⚑ TAK Treatment β€” ACR/VF 2021 & EULAR 2018
  • All TAK patients: GC + non-biologic IS simultaneously (EULAR 2018 β€” unlike GCA where GC alone initially acceptable)
  • Initial GC: Prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day (max 60 mg) β†’ taper over 6–12 months
  • Non-biologic IS (add at diagnosis): MTX 15–25 mg/wk (preferred, ACR 2021), AZA 2 mg/kg/day, or MMF 2 g/day
  • Refractory/relapsing TAK (biologics):
  • β€” TNFi first (ACR 2021 preferred): Infliximab 5 mg/kg IV q6-8wk or Adalimumab SC q2wk; substantial evidence from case series and registry data
  • β€” Tocilizumab: ACR 2021 recommends TCZ only for TAK refractory to other agents (limited RCT data); EULAR 2018 lists as option
  • β€” Abatacept: emerging evidence (CTLA4-Ig)
  • Revascularization (PTA/stenting/bypass): only in inactive disease (remission β‰₯3 months preferred); risk of restenosis in active disease
  • Disease activity monitoring: PET-CT (most sensitive for active inflammation); MRA for structural changes; CRP/ESR (may be normal in active TAK β€” "silent TAK")
πŸ”Ά GCA Visual Emergency Protocol: Any GCA with visual symptoms (amaurosis fugax, AION, diplopia) β†’ IV methylprednisolone 500–1000 mg Γ— 3 days BEFORE any delay. Do NOT wait for TAB β€” biopsy remains valid for β‰₯2 weeks on steroids (giant cells persist). Add aspirin 75–100 mg/day for ischemic risk reduction. Ophthalmology consultation same day. Temporal artery ultrasound (halo sign: hypoechoic wall thickening, non-compressible) can confirm diagnosis rapidly even in emergency setting.
7.3 ANCA-Associated Vasculitis (AAV) β€” EULAR 2022 & ACR/VF 2021
FeatureGPA (Wegener's)MPAEGPA (Churg-Strauss)
ANCA (IF/ELISA)c-ANCA/PR3 80–90%p-ANCA/MPO 70–80%p-ANCA/MPO ~40% (ANCAβˆ’ in 60%)
ENTBloody nasal discharge, septal perforation, saddle nose, otitis, subglottic stenosis, oral ulcersMinimal ENT (key distinguishing point)Allergic rhinitis, chronic sinusitis, nasal polyps
PulmonaryPulmonary nodules (often cavitating, bilateral), DAH, infiltratesDAH (commonest pulmonary cause of death), pulmonary fibrosis (MPO/MPA β€” UIP pattern)Asthma (required); eosinophilic pneumonia; migratory infiltrates
RenalPauci-immune RPGN (80%); necrotizing/crescentic GNPauci-immune RPGN (90%); most severe renal involvement of AAVFocal segmental GN (30%); rarely severe
EosinophiliaAbsentAbsent>10% or >1500/mmΒ³ required
GranulomasGranulomatous (necrotizing) β€” upper + lower airwaysAbsent (pauci-immune only)Eosinophilic infiltration + granulomas
OtherOrbital pseudotumor; episcleritis/scleritis; mononeuritis multiplex; skin purpuraMononeuritis multiplex; purpura; skin ulcersMononeuritis multiplex (most common cause); eosinophilic myocarditis (leading cause of death); skin nodules; GI ischemia
Relapse riskHIGH (PR3+, granulomatous): 50–70% at 5 yearsMODERATE: 30–40%MODERATE–HIGH: 30–70%
⚑ AAV Induction Therapy β€” EULAR 2022 (Hellmich et al., Ann Rheum Dis 2023)
  • Severe/Organ-threatening AAV (GPA/MPA) β€” Remission Induction:
  • β†’ Rituximab (375 mg/mΒ² Γ— 4 weeks OR 2Γ— 1000 mg 2 weeks apart) + high-dose GC β€” Preferred for GPA (PR3+), relapsing disease, childbearing age, bladder/gonadal toxicity concern
  • β†’ OR IV Cyclophosphamide (pulse: 15 mg/kg q2–3wk Γ— 6; or 500 mg IV q2wk Γ— 6 β€” Euro-Lupus-adapted) + high-dose GC
  • β†’ RAVE (NEJM 2010): RTX = CYC for induction; RTX superior for relapsing disease
  • β†’ RITUXVAS (NEJM 2010): RTX + 2 doses CYC = CYC for RPGN
  • Avacopan (C5aR1 inhibitor) β€” EULAR 2022 NEW:
  • β†’ Avacopan 30 mg BID PO + RTX or CYC β€” to substantially reduce GC exposure (not as GC replacement entirely)
  • β†’ ADVOCATE trial (NEJM 2021, Jayne et al.): Avacopan non-inferior for remission at 26 weeks (72.3% vs 70.1%) and superior for sustained remission at 52 weeks (65.7% vs 54.9%, p=0.007)
  • β†’ Superior renal recovery (eGFR improvement), less GC-related toxicity, improved quality of life
  • β†’ FDA-approved Oct 2021 for GPA/MPA; EULAR 2022 conditional recommendation
  • GC Tapering (EULAR 2022): Target ≀5 mg/day prednisolone within 4–5 months (supported by PEXIVAS reduced-dose GC arm)
  • Non-severe/Limited GPA: MTX 20–25 mg/week + GC (no CYC/RTX needed); trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for maintenance of upper airway GPA (reduces ENT relapses)
⚑ PEXIVAS Trial (NEJM 2020) β€” Practice-Changing Results
  • PEXIVAS (Walsh M et al., NEJM 2020): N=704 patients, severe AAV (eGFR <50 OR DAH), 16 countries
  • Plasma exchange (PLEX) arm: PLEX did NOT reduce death or ESKD at 2.9 years (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.65–1.13; p=0.27)
  • β†’ PLEX no longer recommended as standard induction for severe AAV β€” even with severe renal failure or DAH
  • Glucocorticoid arm: Reduced-dose GC protocol non-inferior to standard-dose for death/ESKD AND resulted in significantly fewer serious infections at 1 year (27.3% vs 33.0%)
  • β†’ Supports early aggressive GC tapering strategy (EULAR 2022 recommendation)
  • Note: Very small subgroup with anti-GBM disease co-existing + DAH may still benefit from PLEX β€” clinical judgement required
⚑ AAV Maintenance Therapy β€” EULAR 2022
  • After RTX induction: Rituximab maintenance preferred (over AZA)
  • β†’ RTX 500 mg IV q6 months Γ— 2 years: MAINRITSAN (Ann Int Med 2014): RTX > AZA for relapse prevention
  • β†’ MAINRITSAN2 (Lancet 2016): tailored RTX (CD19 or ANCA-guided redosing) β€” non-inferior to fixed schedule, fewer doses
  • β†’ MAINRITSAN3 (Ann Int Med 2020): Extended RTX maintenance (additional 18 months) vs placebo after first maintenance course β€” relapse-free survival 96% vs 74% at 28 months; benefit especially in PR3-ANCA+
  • β†’ RITAZAREM (NEJM-published 2023, PMC): RTX 1000 mg q4m vs AZA after relapse β€” RTX superior (relapse 13% vs 38%; HR 0.36; p<0.001)
  • After CYC induction: AZA 2 mg/kg/day OR RTX 500 mg q6 months (RTX preferred if relapse history or PR3-ANCA+)
  • Duration of maintenance: Minimum 24 months after achieving remission; consider extended (up to 4–5 years) in PR3-ANCA+, relapsing disease
  • TMP-SMX 960 mg 3Γ—/week for Pneumocystis prophylaxis during induction (EULAR 2022)
  • Monitor B-cell counts and ANCA to guide RTX re-dosing
⚑ EGPA Treatment β€” ACR/VF 2021 & MIRRA/MANDARA Trials
  • Remission induction (severe/organ-threatening EGPA): High-dose GC + CYC or RTX (same approach as GPA/MPA); mepolizumab not adequate for severe manifestations
  • Non-severe/Relapsing EGPA β€” Biologic Anti-IL-5 therapy:
  • β†’ Mepolizumab 300 mg SC q4wk: FDA-approved for relapsing/refractory EGPA; MIRRA trial (NEJM 2017): β‰₯24 weeks remission 28% vs 3% placebo; annual relapse rate halved; GC-sparing (median OCS 10β†’5 mg/day)
  • β†’ Benralizumab 30 mg SC q4wk (anti-IL-5RΞ±): Non-inferior to mepolizumab (MANDARA trial, NEJM 2024): remission 59% vs 56% (95% CI βˆ’13 to 18); superior GC discontinuation (41% vs 26%); approved FDA 2024 for EGPA
  • β†’ Benralizumab advantage: more complete eosinophil depletion (IL-5RΞ± vs IL-5 blockade); SC given q4wk (after first 3 monthly doses β†’ q8wk in asthma, but q4wk in EGPA trial)
  • β†’ Choose mepolizumab or benralizumab based on patient preference/availability/cardiac safety profile
  • Cardiac EGPA (eosinophilic myocarditis): MRI cardiac + troponin; high-dose GC + CYC; echocardiography for thrombus; ICU monitoring
  • Mononeuritis multiplex in EGPA: high-dose GC Β± CYC; may need RTX for refractory
7.4 Immune Complex Vasculitis, PAN & BehΓ§et's Disease
EntityKey FeaturesDiagnosisTreatment
IgA Vasculitis (HSP)Children (peak 4–6y); palpable purpura lower limbs/buttocks; colicky abdominal pain (GI bleeding); arthralgia; IgA nephropathy (hematuria Β± proteinuria)Skin/renal biopsy: IgA deposits by IF. Clinical diagnosis in classic presentationSupportive; NSAIDs for arthralgia; GC for severe abdominal/renal (GN); cyclophosphamide for severe nephritis. Usually self-limiting
Cryoglobulinemic VasculitisType II/III (mixed): palpable purpura, peripheral neuropathy (mononeuritis), membranoproliferative GN; low C4, RF+, cryoglobulins+. 90% due to HCVSerum cryoglobulins (collect warm); C4↓, C3 normal; HCV serology/PCR; skin biopsy: leukocytoclastic vasculitis + ICTreat HCV with DAAs (first-line, removes antigenic drive); RTX for severe/non-HCV cryo-vasculitis; steroids + PLEX for rapidly progressive GN; low-dose GC for mild
Polyarteritis Nodosa (PAN)ANCA-negative medium vessel; segmental transmural inflammation; aneurysms/occlusions; mononeuritis multiplex; renal involvement (renal artery aneurysms, HTN) but NO GN; skin (livedo, ulcers, nodules); orchitis; GI ischemiaAngiography (gold standard): microaneurysms (5–10 mm) in hepatic/renal/mesenteric vessels. Biopsy: fibrinoid necrosis. Hepatitis B in 30%HBV-associated: antiviral (tenofovir) + short GC + PLEX (to clear IC). Non-HBV: GC Β± CYC for severe disease
BehΓ§et's DiseaseRecurrent oral ulcers β‰₯3/year (required) + β‰₯2 of: genital ulcers, eye lesions (uveitis β€” sight-threatening), skin (EN, pseudofolliculitis), pathergy positive. DVT, arterial aneurysms, CNS involvement, GI ulcersICBD 2014 criteria: oral ulcers (2pt) + genital ulcers (2pt) + eye lesions (2pt) + skin (1pt) + pathergy (1pt) + neurological (1pt) + vascular (1pt) β€” score β‰₯4. HLA-B51 associatedMucocutaneous: colchicine (first-line), apremilast (RELIEF trial); Ocular: AZA + GC, TNFi (infliximab for refractory uveitis); Vascular thrombosis: IS (AZA/CsA) Β± anticoagulation (NO anticoag if arterial aneurysm); Severe: GC + AZA or CYC; TNFi for refractory/severe
πŸ”Ά BehΓ§et's Vascular Paradox: Venous thrombosis in BehΓ§et's is driven by vessel wall inflammation, not hypercoagulability. Treatment priority = immunosuppression (AZA, GC) first; add anticoagulation only if no concomitant arterial aneurysm (rupture risk). Anticoagulation alone without IS is inadequate. Pathergy reaction: positive in 30–50% (highest in Japan/Turkey; less reliable in Southeast Asia, European cohorts).
7.5 AAV Disease Monitoring, Relapse Prediction & Special Situations
⚑ ANCA as Biomarker β€” Clinical Interpretation
  • Rising PR3-ANCA: Strong predictor of impending relapse β†’ consider pre-emptive RTX redosing or increase monitoring
  • Rising MPO-ANCA: Weaker predictor of relapse β€” decisions should integrate clinical assessment
  • Persistent ANCA positivity: Common during maintenance; alone does NOT warrant treatment escalation (EULAR 2022)
  • ANCA-negative AAV: Usually MPO-ANCAβˆ’/PR3-ANCAβˆ’ MPA or GPA; use clinical criteria + biopsy; lower relapse rate
  • Monitor CD19+ B cells to guide RTX redosing: B-cell repopulation often precedes ANCA rise and relapse
⚑ Vasculitis Disease Activity & Damage Scores
  • BVAS (Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score): Gold-standard activity assessment; validated in clinical trials (RAVE, ADVOCATE); BVAS = 0 = remission
  • VDI (Vasculitis Damage Index): Accumulated irreversible damage; distinguishes active disease from damage
  • EUVAS/BVAS-WG: GPA-specific version; 33-item tool
Clinical ScenarioManagement (EULAR 2022 / ACR 2021)
Severe relapse (organ-threatening)Repeat RTX induction (preferred) OR CYC if RTX was induction drug; pulse GC; reassess maintenance duration
Limited/minor relapse (constitutional, minor ENT/skin)Increase GC temporarily; add/switch to MTX for GPA; TMP-SMX for upper airway GPA; re-evaluate maintenance
Subglottic stenosis (GPA)Often NOT active vasculitis (fibrosis); intralesional GC injection + dilation; MTX as adjunct; avoid systemic IS escalation if isolated
Pregnancy in AAVRTX: discontinue β‰₯6 months before conception; AZA preferred IS in pregnancy; GC acceptable; monitor ANCA + renal function closely
CKD/ESRD with AAVDose-adjust CYC; RTX preferred (no renal dose adjustment); avacopan dose reduction in severe renal impairment
Refractory AAVConsider: switch RTX↔CYC; avacopan; IVIg; plasma exchange (DAH); IV methylprednisolone pulse; bortezomib (plasma cell-directed, emerging)
7.6 Practice Questions
Q1. A 36-year-old woman presents with 3 months of bloody nasal discharge, saddle-nose deformity, hemoptysis, creatinine 2.9 mg/dL rising, RBC casts on UA, bilateral cavitating lung nodules on CT. c-ANCA/PR3 positive at high titer. She has never received immunosuppression. What is the preferred induction regimen and should you add plasma exchange?
GPA with severe renal + pulmonary involvement β€” Rituximab + pulse GC; NO plasma exchange (PEXIVAS)
Classic GPA: ENT (saddle nose, bloody discharge) + pulmonary (cavitating nodules) + RPGN (creatinine rising + RBC casts) + PR3-ANCA+. Preferred induction: Rituximab 375 mg/mΒ² Γ— 4 weekly + IV methylprednisolone 500 mg Γ— 3 days then pred 1 mg/kg/day tapering to ≀5 mg by month 4–5. PR3-ANCA+ / first presentation β†’ RTX preferred over CYC (RAVE 2010). Add avacopan 30 mg BID if available to reduce GC exposure (ADVOCATE 2021; EULAR 2022 conditional recommendation). Plasma exchange: PEXIVAS 2020 showed NO benefit for death/ESKD even in severe renal failure β€” do NOT add routinely. TMP-SMX prophylaxis for PCP. Maintenance: RTX 500 mg q6 months Γ— β‰₯2 years after remission; PR3+ β†’ consider extended maintenance (MAINRITSAN3).
Q2. A 72-year-old woman with 3 weeks of temporal headache and jaw claudication. ESR 92 mm/hr, CRP 68 mg/L. She develops sudden painless right visual loss. What is the immediate management?
GCA with visual threat β€” IV methylprednisolone 1000 mg Γ— 3 days STAT, then high-dose oral prednisolone
Do NOT wait for temporal artery biopsy. Start IV methylprednisolone 500–1000 mg/day Γ— 3 days immediately. Then oral prednisolone 60 mg/day. TAB should be done within 2 weeks (histology remains valid β€” steroid effect on giant cells minimal in early days). Temporal artery US (halo sign) can confirm rapidly. ACR/EULAR 2022 GCA criteria score: new headache (+2) + jaw claudication (+2) + ESR β‰₯50 (+3) + CRP β‰₯10 (+3) = 10 points β‰₯6 threshold. Add tocilizumab SC weekly (ACR 2021: conditionally recommended for newly diagnosed GCA, especially with visual involvement, to reduce relapse and enable GC taper). Urgently refer to ophthalmology for AION evaluation. Aspirin 75–100 mg/day (not routinely for vasculitis per EULAR 2018, but consider for ischemic stroke/AION risk in this patient).
Q3. A 45-year-old woman with known asthma develops progressive dyspnea, bilateral leg numbness (foot drop), eosinophil count 4,800/mmΒ³, bilateral infiltrates on CXR, p-ANCA/MPO weakly positive. What is the diagnosis and what biologic is now FDA-approved for this condition?
EGPA (Churg-Strauss) β€” Mepolizumab (MIRRA) OR Benralizumab (MANDARA 2024) for relapsing/refractory disease
EGPA diagnosis: asthma (required) + eosinophilia >1500/mmΒ³ + mononeuritis multiplex (foot drop) + eosinophilic pneumonia + p-ANCA/MPO+. ACR/EULAR 2022 EGPA criteria: asthma score + eosinophilia + MPO-ANCA. For induction of severe disease (mononeuritis multiplex): high-dose GC + CYC or RTX. For relapsing/non-severe EGPA: Mepolizumab 300 mg SC q4wk (anti-IL-5; MIRRA trial: halved relapse rate, GC-sparing) OR Benralizumab 30 mg SC q4wk (anti-IL-5RΞ±; MANDARA trial NEJM 2024: non-inferior to mepolizumab, superior OCS discontinuation 41% vs 26%). Both FDA-approved. Cardiac evaluation essential (echo, troponin, MRI) β€” eosinophilic myocarditis is the main cause of EGPA death.

πŸ“š Key References β€” Systemic Vasculitis (High-Impact)

  • EULAR 2022 AAV Recommendations β€” Hellmich B et al., Ann Rheum Dis 2023; 82(8):1071–1082
  • ACR/VF 2021 Guideline β€” AAV β€” Chung SA et al., Arthritis Care Res 2021;73(8):1064–1082
  • ACR/VF 2021 Guideline β€” GCA & TAK β€” Maz M et al., Arthritis Care Res 2021;73(8):1071–1082
  • EULAR 2018 LVV Recommendations β€” Hellmich B et al., Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79(1):19–30
  • ACR/EULAR 2022 Classification Criteria β€” GPA/MPA/EGPA β€” Robson JC et al., Ann Rheum Dis 2022
  • ACR/EULAR 2022 Classification Criteria β€” GCA β€” Ponte C et al., Arthritis Rheumatol 2022;74(12):1881–1889
  • ADVOCATE β€” Jayne DRW et al. (Avacopan in AAV). NEJM 2021;384(7):599–609
  • PEXIVAS β€” Walsh M et al. (Plasma exchange in AAV). NEJM 2020;382(7):622–631
  • GiACTA β€” Stone JH et al. (Tocilizumab in GCA). NEJM 2017;377(4):317–328
  • RAVE β€” Stone JH et al. (RTX vs CYC in AAV). NEJM 2010;363(3):221–232
  • MAINRITSAN3 β€” Charles P et al. (Extended RTX maintenance). Ann Int Med 2020;173(3):179–187
  • RITAZAREM β€” Smith RM et al. (RTX vs AZA after relapse). Ann Rheum Dis 2023
  • MIRRA β€” Wechsler ME et al. (Mepolizumab in EGPA). NEJM 2017;376(20):1921–1932
  • MANDARA β€” Wechsler ME et al. (Benralizumab vs Mepolizumab in EGPA). NEJM 2024;390(10):911–921

8. Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS)

APS is an acquired thrombophilia caused by antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) β€” persistent, causing vascular thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity. May be primary (no underlying disease) or secondary (most often with SLE).

8.1 Sapporo/Sydney Classification Criteria (2006)

Requires β‰₯1 clinical criterion AND β‰₯1 laboratory criterion (antibodies confirmed on β‰₯2 occasions, β‰₯12 weeks apart).

⚑ APS Classification Criteria
  • Clinical criteria:
  • 1. Vascular thrombosis: β‰₯1 arterial, venous, or small vessel thrombosis in any tissue/organ
  • 2. Pregnancy morbidity:
    • β‰₯1 unexplained fetal death β‰₯10 weeks gestation
    • β‰₯1 premature birth ≀34 weeks (severe preeclampsia/eclampsia or placental insufficiency)
    • β‰₯3 consecutive unexplained pregnancy losses <10 weeks
  • Laboratory criteria (must be positive Γ—2, β‰₯12 weeks apart):
  • β€” Lupus anticoagulant (LA) β€” strongest thrombotic risk
  • β€” Anti-cardiolipin IgG or IgM (β‰₯40 GPL/MPL or >99th percentile)
  • β€” Anti-Ξ²β‚‚ glycoprotein I IgG or IgM (>99th percentile)
πŸ”Ά aPL Risk Stratification: High-risk profile = "Triple positive" (LA + aCL + anti-Ξ²β‚‚GPI) β†’ highest thrombosis/pregnancy risk. LA alone is the single strongest predictor of thrombosis. aCL IgG > IgM in significance. Isolated low-positive aCL or anti-Ξ²β‚‚GPI = low risk; clinical context essential.
8.2 Clinical Manifestations
SystemManifestations
Venous thrombosisDVT (most common), PE; Budd-Chiari, portal vein, renal vein thrombosis; cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
Arterial thrombosisStroke (young patient), TIA, MI, peripheral arterial occlusion, retinal artery occlusion
ObstetricRecurrent pregnancy loss, IUFD, IUGR, preeclampsia, placental abruption
CardiacLibman-Sacks endocarditis (valvular vegetations, usually mitral/aortic regurgitation); valve thickening
HematologicThrombocytopenia (immune-mediated; usually mild 100–150k; paradoxically associated with thrombosis not bleeding)
SkinLivedo reticularis (classic "lace-like" pattern), skin ulcers, digital gangrene, superficial thrombophlebitis
RenalAPS nephropathy: small vessel thrombosis β†’ fibrous intimal hyperplasia β†’ CKD, HTN
CNSStroke, TIA, cognitive dysfunction, chorea, seizures, transverse myelitis
8.3 APS Treatment
⚑ APS Treatment Algorithm (EULAR 2019)
  • Thrombotic APS β€” first venous thrombosis: Warfarin INR 2–3; indefinite anticoagulation (high recurrence without treatment)
  • Thrombotic APS β€” arterial thrombosis: Warfarin INR 2–3 (some experts: INR 3–4); add aspirin 75–100 mg/day controversial
  • DOACs in APS: NOT recommended for high-risk aPL profile (triple positive, arterial events) β€” TRAPS trial (rivaroxaban vs warfarin): higher thrombotic events in triple-positive patients on rivaroxaban; DOACs may be used in low-risk single aPL, venous-only APS if warfarin not tolerated
  • Obstetric APS: LDA (low-dose aspirin 75–100 mg from pre-conception/5–6 weeks) + LMWH (prophylactic/therapeutic dose depending on history); continue LMWH 6 weeks postpartum
  • Asymptomatic aPL carriers: LDA if high-risk profile; hydroxychloroquine (SLE-APS)
  • HCQ as adjunct in SLE-APS β€” reduces thrombosis risk
8.4 Catastrophic APS (CAPS)

CAPS = rapidly progressive multi-organ thrombosis (β‰₯3 organs in <1 week) in the setting of aPL. Mortality 30–50% despite treatment.

Triggers: Infection (most common), surgery, anticoagulation withdrawal, pregnancy, malignancy.

Clinical: Renal failure, pulmonary (ARDS, PE), CNS (stroke, encephalopathy), cardiac, skin (livedo, gangrene), adrenal infarction.

Treatment ("Triple therapy"):

  • Anticoagulation (IV heparin/UFH) β€” immediate
  • Corticosteroids (IV methylprednisolone pulse) β€” treat underlying inflammation
  • Plasma exchange (PLEX) Β± IVIg β€” remove circulating aPL and cytokines
  • Eculizumab (anti-C5) for refractory CAPS β€” complement-mediated microangiopathy
  • Rituximab for refractory cases

πŸ“š Key References β€” APS

  • EULAR 2019 APS Recommendations β€” Tektonidou MG et al., Ann Rheum Dis 2019
  • TRAPS trial β€” Pengo V et al., NEJM 2018 (DOACs inferior in triple-positive APS)
  • WOAPS β€” Obstetric APS management
8.5 Practice Questions
Q1. A 32-year-old woman with SLE has had 2 first-trimester losses and 1 stillbirth at 28 weeks. She is planning another pregnancy. aPL: LA positive Γ—2, anti-Ξ²β‚‚GPI IgG positive Γ—2. What is the treatment plan?
Obstetric APS β€” LDA + prophylactic LMWH throughout pregnancy
She meets Sapporo criteria: obstetric (β‰₯3 losses <10wk OR β‰₯1 fetal loss β‰₯10wk) + aPL lab criteria (LA+ Γ—2 β‰₯12 weeks apart; anti-Ξ²β‚‚GPI+ Γ—2). Treatment: low-dose aspirin (100 mg/day) start before conception or at 5–6 weeks + prophylactic LMWH (e.g., enoxaparin 40 mg/day) from positive pregnancy test throughout pregnancy + 6 weeks postpartum. Continue HCQ (she has SLE). Monitor closely: fetal surveillance, Doppler, preeclampsia screening.

9. Osteoarthritis & Metabolic Bone Disease

OA is the most prevalent joint disease worldwide β€” a disorder of whole-joint failure, not merely "wear and tear." Metabolic bone disease (osteoporosis, osteomalacia, Paget's) is common in the rheumatology patient population.

9.1 OA Pathogenesis & Classification

Pathogenesis: Cartilage matrix degradation (MMP, ADAMTS) + subchondral bone remodeling + synovitis + osteophyte formation. Risk factors: age, obesity, female, prior joint injury, genetic factors, repetitive loading.

TypeFeaturesExamples
Primary OAIdiopathic; aging + genetic; DIP, PIP, 1st CMC (thumb base), knee, hip, spineNodal OA (Heberden's + Bouchard's nodes)
Secondary OAUnderlying cause: prior injury, developmental (DDH), metabolic (hemochromatosis, ochronosis, acromegaly), inflammatory, neuropathicPost-traumatic knee OA; hemochromatosis MCP OA
Erosive/Inflammatory OAAggressive OA variant; DIP/PIP erosions; episodes of inflammation; "gull-wing" sign on X-ray; F>M; menopausalInflammatory OA of hands
πŸ”Ά OA vs RA Hand Features: OA: DIP + 1st CMC involvement, hard bony swelling (Heberden/Bouchard nodes), no morning stiffness >30 min, no systemic features. RA: MCP/PIP involvement, DIP sparing, soft synovitis, prolonged morning stiffness, RF/ACPA+, systemic.
9.2 OA Radiographic Features & Grading
⚑ OA X-ray Features (ABCDEF-SP β€” Dr. Paijit)
  • A (Alignment): Varus (medial compartment OA) or valgus deformity of knee
  • B (Bone density): Normal or increased (subchondral sclerosis)
  • C (Cartilage/joint space): Asymmetric joint space narrowing (medial > lateral in knee)
  • D (Deformity): Subchondral cysts (geodes), subchondral sclerosis
  • E (Erosions): Usually absent (erosive OA: central erosion β€” "gull-wing" sign)
  • S (Soft tissue): No significant swelling; bony enlargement
  • Osteophytes: Marginal (key feature) β€” "buttress osteophytes" at DIP/PIP; "traction osteophytes" at entheses
  • Gull-wing sign (erosive OA): Central erosion + marginal osteophyte at DIP β†’ resembles seagull wing
GradeKellgren-Lawrence (Knee)Iwano (Hip)
0NormalNormal (>4mm)
IPossible osteophyte; no JSNNarrowing 2–4mm
IIDefinite osteophyte; possible JSNNarrowing 1–2mm
IIIDefinite osteophyte + JSN; sclerosis; possible cystsNarrowing <1mm; no bone contact
IVLarge osteophytes; severe JSN; sclerosis + cysts; deformityBone contact (stage IVa/b/c)
9.3 OA Management
⚑ OARSI 2019 / EULAR 2019 OA Recommendations
  • Non-pharmacologic (first-line, always): Exercise (aerobic + strengthening + flexibility), weight loss (β‰₯5% body weight), physiotherapy, occupational therapy, assistive devices, patient education
  • Pharmacologic:
  • β€” Topical NSAIDs (diclofenac gel): first choice for hand/knee OA; good efficacy, less systemic toxicity
  • β€” Oral NSAIDs: effective; use lowest dose/shortest duration; use PPI if GI risk; avoid in CKD, CVD, elderly
  • β€” Intra-articular corticosteroids: short-term (6–12 weeks) pain relief; max 3–4/year per joint; no long-term cartilage benefit
  • β€” Duloxetine: central sensitization; knee OA with central pain component; FDA-approved
  • β€” Tramadol: when NSAIDs contraindicated/insufficient; avoid strong opioids
  • β€” Intra-articular hyaluronic acid: controversial; some evidence for knee OA
  • Surgical: Total joint replacement (TJR) for refractory severe OA (K-L grade III–IV + functional limitation)
  • NOT recommended: Glucosamine/chondroitin (insufficient evidence); arthroscopic lavage/debridement
9.4 Osteoporosis β€” Diagnosis & Treatment

Diagnosis: DXA BMD T-score ≀ βˆ’2.5 at lumbar spine or femoral neck (WHO). Osteopenia: T-score βˆ’1.0 to βˆ’2.5. Normal: T-score β‰₯ βˆ’1.0. FRAX tool: 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) β€” integrates BMD + clinical risk factors.

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO): Most common secondary cause in rheumatology. Any prednisolone dose β‰₯5 mg/day for β‰₯3 months β†’ start prophylaxis. ACR 2017 GIO guidelines: stratify by FRAX/BMD β†’ calcium + vitamin D + bisphosphonate (oral or IV).

⚑ Osteoporosis Treatment Summary
  • Calcium 1000–1200 mg/day + Vitamin D 800–1000 IU/day (all patients)
  • Bisphosphonates (first-line antiresorptive): Alendronate 70 mg/week PO, Risedronate 35 mg/week PO, Zoledronic acid 5 mg/year IV β€” prevent vertebral + hip fractures; ONJ risk (especially IV, dental procedures); AFF risk (>5 years use)
  • Denosumab (anti-RANKL): SC q6 months; effective, no renal dose adjustment; rebound vertebral fractures if stopped abruptly β†’ transition to bisphosphonate
  • Teriparatide (PTH 1-34 analog): anabolic; SC daily; for severe/multiple fractures; max 2 years; expensive
  • Romosozumab (anti-sclerostin): dual anabolic + antiresorptive; SC monthly Γ— 12 months; most effective for very high-risk fractures; CV risk concern (black box warning)
  • Raloxifene (SERM): reduces vertebral fractures only (not hip); premenopausal women; increases VTE risk
9.5 Practice Questions
Q1. A 58-year-old woman with SLE on prednisolone 10 mg/day for 2 years. DXA shows T-score βˆ’2.1 lumbar spine, βˆ’2.3 femoral neck. No prior fractures. What is the most appropriate management?
Calcium + Vitamin D + bisphosphonate (glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis)
T-score βˆ’2.3 with chronic steroid use (β‰₯5 mg/day β‰₯3 months) = high-risk GIO. ACR 2017: start oral bisphosphonate (alendronate 70 mg/week) + calcium 1000–1200 mg/day + Vitamin D 800–1000 IU/day. Minimize steroid dose (use steroid-sparing agents for SLE). Monitor DXA every 1–2 years. If unable to take oral bisphosphonate or CrCl <30 β†’ IV zoledronic acid 5 mg/year or denosumab.

10. Autoinflammatory & Miscellaneous Rheumatic Diseases

A diverse group including adult-onset Still's disease, periodic fever syndromes, IgG4-RD, polymyalgia rheumatica, relapsing polychondritis, and reactive arthritis β€” often presenting diagnostic challenges in the general internal medicine setting.

10.1 Adult-Onset Still's Disease (AOSD)

AOSD is a rare systemic inflammatory disorder: quotidian fever + evanescent salmon-colored rash + arthritis. Now considered part of the hyperferritinemic syndrome spectrum.

⚑ Yamaguchi Criteria for AOSD (β‰₯5 criteria, β‰₯2 major, exclude infections/malignancy/CTD)
  • Major: Fever β‰₯39Β°C lasting β‰₯1 week; arthralgia/arthritis β‰₯2 weeks; evanescent salmon-colored rash; WBC β‰₯10,000/mmΒ³ (β‰₯80% PMN)
  • Minor: Sore throat; lymphadenopathy/splenomegaly; LFT abnormal; RF and ANA negative

Key biomarker: Serum ferritin markedly elevated (>5Γ— ULN); glycosylated ferritin <20% (normal 50–80%) highly specific. Monitor for MAS (ferritin suddenly very high + cytopenias + coagulopathy = trigger MAS workup).

Treatment: NSAIDs (mild); Prednisolone 0.5–1 mg/kg/day (moderate-severe); MTX (steroid-sparing); Biologics for refractory: Anakinra (IL-1 inhibitor, excellent for systemic disease), Canakinumab, Tocilizumab (IL-6R, better for articular). MAS complication: IL-1/IL-18 pathway β†’ treat with anakinra + high-dose steroids Β± CsA.

10.2 Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR)

PMR: bilateral shoulder and pelvic girdle aching + stiffness, age >50y (peak 70–75y), markedly elevated ESR/CRP, normal CK (distinguishes from myositis). Dramatic response to low-dose steroids (diagnostic!). Associated with GCA in 15–20%.

ACR/EULAR 2012 PMR Classification Criteria: Age β‰₯50 + bilateral shoulder aching + ESR/CRP elevated + score β‰₯4 (without ultrasound) or β‰₯5 (with ultrasound). Points: morning stiffness >45 min (2), hip pain/limitation (1), absent RF/ACPA (2), absence of peripheral synovitis (1), ultrasound: subdeltoid bursitis/glenohumeral synovitis/biceps tenosynovitis (1/2 pts).

⚑ PMR Treatment
  • Initial: Prednisolone 12.5–25 mg/day (not high-dose) β€” dramatic response within 48–72h (if not β†’ reconsider diagnosis)
  • Slow taper: reduce by 1 mg/month once clinical response achieved; total duration 12–24 months
  • Relapse common (30–50%); increase dose back to last effective dose
  • Tocilizumab (PMR-SPARE trial) β€” steroid-sparing benefit in relapsing PMR; approved
  • Screen for GCA: if headache, jaw claudication, visual symptoms β†’ urgent temporal artery evaluation
10.3 IgG4-Related Disease (IgG4-RD)

IgG4-RD is a fibro-inflammatory condition causing tumefactive lesions with IgG4-positive plasma cell infiltration and storiform fibrosis. Mimics malignancy, lymphoma, and many inflammatory conditions.

Common manifestations: Autoimmune pancreatitis (type 1, "sausage pancreas" on CT), IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis, IgG4 orbital disease (pseudotumor), Riedel thyroiditis, IgG4 tubulointerstitial nephritis, retroperitoneal fibrosis, aortitis, submandibular gland swelling (Mikulicz).

Diagnosis: Serum IgG4 >135 mg/dL (elevated in 70%; not sensitive); biopsy essential: lymphoplasmacytic infiltration + storiform fibrosis + obliterative phlebitis + IgG4+ plasma cells >10/HPF with IgG4:IgG ratio >40%.

Treatment: Prednisolone 0.5–0.6 mg/kg/day β†’ dramatic response; taper over 3–6 months; high relapse rate off steroids. Steroid-sparing: AZA, MTX. Rituximab (anti-CD20) excellent for relapsing/refractory β€” depletes IgG4-producing B cells.

10.4 Relapsing Polychondritis (RPC)

Episodic inflammatory destruction of cartilaginous structures. McAdam criteria: β‰₯3 of β€” auricular chondritis (bilateral; spares earlobes), non-erosive seronegative arthritis, nasal chondritis (saddle nose), ocular inflammation (episcleritis, scleritis), respiratory tract chondritis (larynx/trachea β€” most dangerous), audiovestibular dysfunction.

Key danger: Tracheobronchial involvement β†’ dynamic airway collapse, stridor, respiratory failure. ENT evaluation mandatory. CT airway: "tracheomalacia."

Treatment: NSAIDs + dapsone (mild); Prednisolone (moderate-severe); MTX/AZA/CsA; biologics (TNFi, IL-6Ri, tocilizumab) for refractory. Airway stenting for severe tracheal collapse.

10.5 Practice Questions
Q1. A 72-year-old man presents with 3 weeks of bilateral shoulder and hip girdle aching, morning stiffness 2 hours, ESR 95 mm/hr. CK is normal. ANA and RF are negative. He responds dramatically to prednisone 20 mg/day. What should you also screen for in this patient?
Polymyalgia Rheumatica β€” Screen for Giant Cell Arteritis
Classic PMR: bilateral girdle aching + elevated ESR + age >50 + normal CK + dramatic response to low-dose steroids. Must screen for GCA (co-occurs in 15–20%): ask about headache (temporal), scalp tenderness, jaw claudication, visual symptoms. If any GCA symptoms β†’ urgent temporal artery biopsy/ultrasound + high-dose steroids (40–60 mg/day). Temporal artery tenderness or pulse loss on exam = urgent investigation. Maintain vigilance throughout PMR course as GCA can develop later.

11. Rheumatologic Emergencies

Life-threatening complications of rheumatic diseases require rapid recognition and treatment. Key emergencies: MAS/HLH, Scleroderma Renal Crisis, Diffuse Alveolar Hemorrhage, CAPS, and acute monoarthritis.

11.1 Macrophage Activation Syndrome (MAS) / Secondary HLH

MAS is a life-threatening hyperinflammatory syndrome (secondary HLH) occurring in rheumatic diseases β€” especially AOSD, SLE, Kawasaki disease, other CTDs. Uncontrolled macrophage activation + cytokine storm (IL-18, IFN-Ξ³).

⚑ MAS Diagnosis β€” 2016 Classification Criteria (Ravelli)
  • Fever + Ferritin β‰₯684 ng/mL + any 2 of:
  • β€” Platelet ≀181Γ—10⁹/L
  • β€” AST >48 U/L
  • β€” Triglycerides β‰₯156 mg/dL
  • β€” Fibrinogen ≀360 mg/dL

Clinical red flags: Sudden ferritin spike (>10,000 = very suspicious; >500,000 = near-diagnostic), cytopenias in setting of inflammatory disease, consumptive coagulopathy (↓fibrinogen, ↑D-dimer), hepatosplenomegaly, encephalopathy, hemophagocytosis on bone marrow biopsy.

Treatment:

  • Dexamethasone (high-dose IV) or methylprednisolone pulse β€” first-line
  • Cyclosporine A (CsA) 2–7 mg/kg/day β€” rapid effect; first-line for MAS in sJIA/AOSD
  • Etoposide (VP-16): if refractory, HLH-94 protocol β€” CD8+ T cell/macrophage cytotoxicity
  • Anakinra (IL-1 inhibitor): effective for MAS in AOSD; rapid response; off-label but widely used
  • Ruxolitinib (JAK1/2 inhibitor): emerging evidence for refractory MAS/sHLH
  • Treat underlying trigger (infection, SLE flare, AOSD)
πŸ”Ά MAS vs Disease Flare (SLE/AOSD): Paradoxical worsening despite treatment + sudden ferritin spike + cytopenias + falling ESR (fibrinogen consumed) + rising LDH/AST = think MAS. ESR falls while CRP stays high = consumptive hypofibrinogenemia β†’ clue to MAS.
11.2 Scleroderma Renal Crisis (SRC)

Acute severe hypertension (often >150/90 or new HTN) + AKI in SSc patient β€” typically dcSSc in first 5 years. Anti-RNA pol III antibody + high-dose corticosteroids are key risk factors.

Pathophysiology: Renal arteriolar vasospasm + intimal proliferation β†’ MAHA (schistocytes, ↑LDH, ↓haptoglobin, Coombsβˆ’) + thrombocytopenia (TMA picture).

Treatment:

  • ACE inhibitor IMMEDIATELY (captopril 6.25–25 mg q8h titrating up; or lisinopril) β€” life-saving even if creatinine rising
  • Target: normalize BP within 72h
  • Avoid ARBs (less evidence); avoid CCBs as sole therapy
  • ~30–50% still require dialysis short-term; ~30% can recover renal function months later with ACEi
  • Continue ACEi even on dialysis β€” may allow renal recovery
  • Prevention: minimize steroids in SSc; if steroids needed, keep <15 mg/day; monitor BP closely
11.3 Diffuse Alveolar Hemorrhage (DAH)

DAH = alveolar flooding with red blood cells β€” not always accompanied by hemoptysis (can be "silent"). Rheumatic causes: SLE (lupus pneumonitis/DAH), AAV (GPA, MPA), anti-GBM disease (Goodpasture), APS, mixed.

Clinical triad: Hemoptysis (absent in 33%) + bilateral infiltrates on CXR/CT + falling hemoglobin.

BAL (bronchoalveolar lavage): Gold standard β€” progressively bloodier returns from serial lavage; hemosiderin-laden macrophages (>20% = chronic); if present β†’ confirms DAH and excludes other diagnoses.

Treatment:

  • IV methylprednisolone 500–1000 mg/day Γ— 3 days (pulse) β€” all causes
  • Add Cyclophosphamide IV for AAV, severe SLE-DAH
  • Add Rituximab for AAV-DAH (if CYC contraindicated or PR3-ANCA)
  • Plasma exchange (PLEX): anti-GBM disease + SLE-DAH + CAPS-related
  • Mechanical ventilation (ARDS protocol if needed); packed RBC transfusion for severe anemia
πŸ”Ά SLE-DAH Emergency: New respiratory failure + bilateral infiltrates in known SLE or at SLE diagnosis β†’ urgent BAL. Mortality 50–90% without treatment. Start pulse steroids immediately; add CYC; consider PLEX. Check ANCA + anti-GBM to rule out overlap.
11.4 Acute Monoarthritis β€” Approach

Always rule out septic arthritis first β€” it is the most dangerous cause and requires urgent drainage + antibiotics.

ConditionWBC (cells/mmΒ³)PMN%CrystalsCulture
Normal<200<25%β€”Negative
Non-inflammatory (OA, trauma)200–2,000<25%β€”Negative
Inflammatory (RA, SpA, reactive)2,000–50,00050–75%β€”Negative
Crystal arthropathy (Gout/CPPD)5,000–100,000>75%PresentNegative
Septic arthritis>50,000 (can overlap)>90%β€”Positive (~50%)
πŸ”Ά Key Principle: Crystals DO NOT rule out septic arthritis β€” they can coexist. Always send culture. WBC >100,000/mmΒ³ = septic until proven otherwise. Most common organisms: S. aureus (any age), N. gonorrhoeae (young sexually active adults), Gram-negative bacilli (elderly, immunocompromised). Treatment: urgent arthrocentesis (therapeutic drainage) + IV antibiotics (empiric: vancomycin Β± ceftriaxone); surgical washout for refractory/hip/shoulder.
11.5 Practice Questions
Q1. A 28-year-old woman with AOSD develops high spiking fever, new pancytopenia (Hb 7.2, PLT 58k, WBC 2.1k), ferritin 85,000 ng/mL, AST 210 U/L, fibrinogen 180 mg/dL. What is the complication and management?
Macrophage Activation Syndrome (MAS) β€” Triple therapy: steroids + cyclosporine Β± anakinra
MAS complicating AOSD: ferritin >684 + PLT ≀181k + AST >48 + fibrinogen ≀360 = meets 2016 criteria. Ferritin 85,000 is extremely high β†’ near-diagnostic. Management: (1) IV dexamethasone or pulse methylprednisolone; (2) Cyclosporine A 3–5 mg/kg/day (most evidence in AOSD-MAS); (3) Anakinra (IL-1i) β€” rapid response for AOSD-MAS; may add to CsA. Rule out and treat infectious trigger. Bone marrow biopsy if diagnosis uncertain. ICU-level care for severe cases. Ferritin, CBC, LFT, coagulation daily monitoring.

12. Radiology in Rheumatic Diseases

Systematic radiographic interpretation is essential for rheumatologic diagnosis. Based on Dr. Paijit Asavatanabodee's ABCDEF-SP framework (Phramongkutklao Hospital, 34th IMBR, April 2026) β€” the gold-standard systematic approach for rheumatology plain films.

12.1 ABCDEF-SP Systematic Approach
⚑ ABCDEF-SP Mnemonic (Dr. Paijit)
  • A β€” Alignment: Subluxation, dislocation, deformity (varus/valgus/swan-neck/ulnar drift)
  • B β€” Bone density: Diffuse (osteoporosis) vs juxta-articular (RA early); normal/increased (OA, gout)
  • C β€” Cartilage/Joint space: Symmetric (RA, SpA) vs asymmetric (OA, septic); chondrocalcinosis (CPPD)
  • D β€” Deformity of bone: Subchondral cysts/sclerosis (OA); bone destruction (septic); intraosseous tophi
  • E β€” Erosions: Marginal (RA); central gull-wing (erosive OA); punched-out overhanging (Gout = Martel's sign); pencil-in-cup (PsA)
  • F β€” Foreign bodies: Prosthesis, surgical implants, calcified tophi, soft tissue calcification
  • S β€” Soft tissue: Swelling pattern (fusiform = RA; asymmetric = gout/septic); tophi; calcinosis (SSc, DM)
  • P β€” Periosteal reaction: New bone formation; periostitis (PsA, reactive arthritis); syndesmophytes (AS); "whiskers" (diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis)
12.2 Comparative Radiographic Features β€” RA vs PsA vs OA vs Gout
FeatureRAPsAOAGout
DistributionMCP, PIP, wrist; symmetric; DIP sparedDIP + any joint; asymmetric; "ray" patternDIP, PIP, 1st CMC, knee, hip; asymmetric1st MTP, midfoot, ankle, knee; asymmetric
Bone densityJuxta-articular osteopenia (early sign)Normal or increasedNormal or increased (subchondral sclerosis)Normal (preserved β€” key finding)
Joint spaceSymmetric narrowingVariable; ankylosis in DIPAsymmetric narrowing (weight-bearing)Preserved until late
ErosionsMarginal (barebone area); ill-defined; juxta-articularPencil-in-cup (DIP); mouse-ear osteophytesAbsent (or central in erosive OA β€” gull-wing)Punched-out lytic Β± sclerotic margin; overhanging margin (Martel)
New boneAbsentPeriostitis, ankylosis, enthesophytesOsteophytes (marginal)Rarely in tophi area
Soft tissueFusiform symmetric swellingDactylitis ("sausage digit")Bony enlargementEccentric tophaceous swelling; asymmetric
Special signBoutonnière/swan-neck/ulnar drift; carpal crowdingOpera glass; pencil-in-cup; ankylosisGull-wing (erosive); K-L grading; buttress osteophytesMartel's sign (overhanging margin)
12.3 AS Spine vs DISH vs Spondylodiscitis vs OVCF
FeatureASDISHInfective SpondylodiscitisOVCF
Osteophytes/OssificationThin, vertical, marginal syndesmophytes; ALL, ISL ossificationThick, flowing anterior osteophytes β‰₯4 vertebrae; non-marginal; right-sidedβ€”β€”
Disc spacePreserved early; obliterated latePreserved; lucency between osteophyte and vertebral bodyDisc destruction (both endplates)Anterior wedge; height loss; no disc destruction
Sacroiliac jointBilateral sacroiliitis β†’ ankylosisNormalNormal (unless pyogenic SIJ)Normal
Posterior elementsFacet ankylosis; dagger + trolley track signsNormalMay be involved (epidural abscess)May fracture in severe
MRI key findingsRomanus lesion (corner erosion); fatty change; bone marrow edema (STIR)β€”Disc + endplate signal change (T2↑, T1↓); epidural/paraspinal abscess; enhancementVertebral edema (T1↓, T2↑/STIR); marrow replacement
CRP/ESRElevated (active disease)NormalMarkedly elevated; feverNormal or mildly elevated
πŸ”Ά Spondylodiscitis MRI vs OVCF (Dr. Paijit): Spondylodiscitis: disc involved (T2 bright disc + endplate erosion) + paraspinal/epidural abscess + strong enhancement. OVCF: disc preserved; marrow edema of vertebral body; no soft tissue mass; vacuum disc sign favors chronic/benign OVCF. Key: if disc is destroyed = infection until proven otherwise. Biopsy if diagnosis uncertain (CT-guided).
12.4 Advanced Imaging in Rheumatology
ModalityBest Use in RheumatologyKey Finding
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound (MSUS)Synovitis (gray-scale + PD), tenosynovitis, enthesitis, crystal deposition (gout: double contour; CPPD: chondrocalcinosis), guided injection/aspirationPD signal = active synovitis; double contour sign = MSU crystals on cartilage
MRIEarly RA (bone marrow edema, tenosynovitis), sacroiliitis (axSpA), myositis (STIR for active inflammation), AVN, spondylodiscitis, soft tissue massesSTIR sequence: bone marrow edema/inflammation; Romanus lesion in AS
DECT (Dual-Energy CT)Gout: urate crystal deposition (color-coded green); differentiates urate from calcium; tophi mapping; difficult joints (spine, hip)Urate = green on DECT; calcium = blue
PET-CT (¹⁸F-FDG)Large vessel vasculitis (TAK, GCA β€” aortic uptake); FUO workup; paraneoplastic/malignancy search in myositisAortic wall uptake = LVV activity; standardized uptake value (SUV) for quantification
Nailfold Capillaroscopy (NFC)SSc/CTD screening; Raynaud's evaluation; early SSc pattern: giant/enlarged loops; late: avascular areas + branching/bushy loopsScleroderma pattern: enlarged + dropout capillaries; vs normal: regular, horseshoe-shaped
12.5 Practice Questions
Q1. A 70-year-old man with known gout has a plain X-ray of his right foot showing: normal bone density, preserved joint spaces, a punched-out lytic lesion at the 1st MTP with a sclerotic margin and overhanging cortical margin. What is the name of this specific sign and what does it confirm?
Martel's sign (overhanging margin) β€” pathognomonic for chronic tophaceous gout
Martel's sign = punched-out lytic erosion with overhanging (mushroom-shaped / rat-bite) cortical margin due to tophus eroding bone from outside. Preserved bone density distinguishes gout from RA (where juxta-articular osteopenia is early). Preserved joint space until late distinguishes from OA. Asymmetric, eccentric soft tissue swelling from tophi. Normal/high bone density + preserved joint space + Martel's sign = classic tophaceous gout triad.
Q2. On AP X-ray of the spine, you see three vertical lines: a central line from ALL + interspinous ligament ossification, and two paravertebral lines from bilateral facet ankylosis. What are these signs called and what is the diagnosis?
Dagger sign (central) + Trolley track sign (3 lines) β€” Ankylosing Spondylitis
Dagger sign = single central dense line on AP view = ossification of supraspinous/interspinous ligaments + ALL. Trolley track sign = 3 parallel lines on AP view = dagger sign (centre) + bilateral facet joint/paravertebral muscle ossification (outer 2 lines). Also look for: bamboo spine (bridging syndesmophytes), squaring of vertebral bodies, bilateral sacroiliitis. These signs indicate advanced AS with complete spinal ankylosis. Distinguish from DISH: DISH = thick flowing right-sided osteophytes, no sacroiliitis, disc spaces preserved.

πŸ“š Key References β€” Radiology in Rheumatology

  • Dr. Paijit Asavatanabodee β€” "Radiology in Rheumatology," 34th IMBR, PMK Hospital, April 6, 2026
  • EULAR Recommendations for MSUS in RA β€” Colebatch AN et al., Ann Rheum Dis 2013
  • ACR/EULAR 2022 axSpA Imaging Guidelines β€” Ramiro S et al., Ann Rheum Dis 2022
  • OMERACT Ultrasound Group β€” Standardized US definitions for synovitis scoring